Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use shell=False in subprocess Function Calls #438

Conversation

pixeebot[bot]
Copy link

@pixeebot pixeebot bot commented Apr 18, 2024

This codemod sets the shell keyword argument to False in subprocess module function calls that have set it to True.

Setting shell=True will execute the provided command through the system shell which can lead to shell injection vulnerabilities. In the worst case this can give an attacker the ability to run arbitrary commands on your system. In most cases using shell=False is sufficient and leads to much safer code.

The changes from this codemod look like this:

 import subprocess
- subprocess.run("echo 'hi'", shell=True)
+ subprocess.run("echo 'hi'", shell=False)
More reading

Powered by: pixeebot (codemod ID: pixee:python/subprocess-shell-false)

Copy link
Author

pixeebot bot commented Apr 26, 2024

I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?

If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!

Copy link
Author

pixeebot bot commented Apr 27, 2024

Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!

Copy link
Author

pixeebot bot commented May 3, 2024

This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know!

You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want.

@pixeebot pixeebot bot closed this May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants