-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 751
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Dry-Run Flags to borg extract Command (#8564) #8575
Open
alighazi288
wants to merge
8
commits into
borgbackup:master
Choose a base branch
from
alighazi288:fix-issue-8564
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+61
−26
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23d1727
Added test to verify if flags are being displayed when running "extra…
alighazi288 076a41a
Ensured that dry-run extractions now correctly list the files with th…
alighazi288 cabf6ce
Updated test case to match the correct output format for dry-run extr…
alighazi288 2068b9f
Create .coverage 2
alighazi288 471b175
Fixed test to validate correct behavior of dry-run with inclusion and…
alighazi288 edd3a50
Fix test case
alighazi288 8404970
Fix Extraction Logic
alighazi288 6798fca
Remove redundant `None` parameter from `archive.iter_items` call
alighazi288 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Binary file not shown.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you remove checking output_list?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ThomasWaldmann I thought it simplified the logging logic. In the updated code, we always log the paths of the items with a prefix indicating whether they are matched or not. Also, since both includes and excludes are being logged, wouldn't it always be True? If it is necessary to conditionally control the logging based on the output_list flag, I can reintroduce that check.