Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CORE-69] Update logback-classic from 1.5.8 to 1.5.10 #1454

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

broadbot
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates ch.qos.logback:logback-classic from 1.5.8 to 1.5.10

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "ch.qos.logback", artifactId = "logback-classic" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "ch.qos.logback", artifactId = "logback-classic" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-patch, semver-spec-patch, commit-count:1

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scala_Steward Scala Steward label Oct 14, 2024
@davidangb davidangb changed the title [AJ-1784] Update logback-classic from 1.5.8 to 1.5.10 [CORE-69] Update logback-classic from 1.5.8 to 1.5.10 Oct 15, 2024
@davidangb davidangb merged commit 11f23c3 into develop Oct 15, 2024
13 checks passed
@davidangb davidangb deleted the update/logback-classic-1.5.10 branch October 15, 2024 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Scala_Steward Scala Steward
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants