Deprecate other_locations in analyzer spec, to clarify vs. trace #66
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It appears that codeclimate#20 intended to remove `other_locations` as superseded by `trace`, but it left the old entry (only) in the example JSON object. An expanded section describing `other_locations` was put back in codeclimate#57, that issue thread asserts that it is still valid and in use by Code Climate's duplication engine. These two fields certainly seem functionally redundant, hence codeclimate#56. Under assumption that both are used/accepted in implementations of the current version of the spec, this change restores presence of both in the reference but proposes deprecating `other_locations` and hence de-emphasizes its documentation.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It appears that #20 intended to remove
other_locationsas superseded bytrace, but it left the old entry (only) in the example JSON object. An expanded section describingother_locationswas put back in #57, that issue thread asserts that it is still valid and in use by Code Climate's duplication engine.These two fields certainly seem functionally redundant, hence the confusion in #56, which I shared too.
Under assumption that both are used/accepted in implementations of the current version of the spec, this change restores presence of both in the reference but proposes deprecating
other_locationsand hence de-emphasizes its documentation (Traceobjects are already specified in detail).The spec version was 0.3.1 as of #57, and still is now.