More flexible services for RPC

[tomvanmele]

What type of change is this?

• Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
• New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
• Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
• Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• I added a line to the CHANGELOG.md file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
• I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
• I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke lint).
• I added new functions/classes and made them available on a second-level import, e.g. compas.datastructures.Mesh.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

[Licini]

nice!

[tomvanmele]

# special.py

from compas.rpc import Server
from compas.rpc import Dispatcher


class SpecialService(Dispatcher):
    def special(self):
        return "special"


def start_service():
    server = Server(("0.0.0.0", 1753))
    service = SpecialService()
    server.register_instance(service)
    server.serve_forever()


if __name__ == "__main__":
    import argparse
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    args, unknown = parser.parse_known_args()
    start_service()

# client.py

import os
from compas.rpc import Proxy

proxy = Proxy(service="special", cwd=os.path.dirname("__file__"))

proxy.special()

[gonzalocasas]

lgtm + feedback

[gonzalocasas]

delete

[gonzalocasas]

I'm not very convinced about the naming, "special" but why? What's special about it? :) Do you mean "Custom" or "UserDefined"?

[tomvanmele]

not it is just an example. perhaps it should be removed and the example added to the docs

[gonzalocasas]

👍