Rebuild for CUDA 12 #59
Conversation
conda-forge-admin
requested review from
adibbley,
bdice,
jakirkham and
vyasr
as code owners
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice. I tried to rerender for you but ran into some issues. Please check the output logs of the latest rerendering GitHub actions workflow run for errors. You can also ping conda-forge/core for further assistance or try re-rendering locally. This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/cudnn-feedstock/actions/runs/5138822875. |
As `cuda_compiler` is in `zip_keys` with `cuda_compiler_version`, extend it to have an equal number of entries to match the other keys it is zipped with.
|
@conda-forge-admin, please re-render |
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.05.31.22.15.24
|
@conda-forge-admin, please re-render |
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.05.31.22.15.24
jakirkham
added
automerge
|
@conda-forge-admin, please re-render |
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.05.31.22.15.24
|
Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot! I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:
Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day! |
| # Disable binary relocation to workaround patchelf issue | ||
| # xref: https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/492 | ||
| binary_relocation: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seeing this in CI:
ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned
Looks like issue ( NixOS/patchelf#492 )
Disabling binary_relocation to workaround this issue
Manually add CUDA 12 migrator to move the migration forward past this package (it is effectively already migrated).
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.
I've started rerendering the recipe as instructed in #54.
If I find any needed changes to the recipe, I'll push them to this PR shortly. Thank you for waiting!
Here's a checklist to do before merging.
Fixes #54