Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

factor out code to determine DNS address record label #65

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mzagrabe
Copy link
Contributor

@mzagrabe mzagrabe commented Feb 1, 2017

Hey Carlos,

The branch you merged earlier today to set the correct DNS address record label was slightly incomplete. When one creates a new address (either v4 or v6) the label for the DNS address record still used 'A/AAAA' when it could have been smarter and chosen the right label. This branch fixes those omissions.

Thanks!

-m

There is a second location in management/ip.html where we need to set
the label for the DNS address record. This second location in the code
get executed when a new address is created (and there is no "id" passed
in via the arguments of the Mason component.)

The need for a second place to contain logic warrants factoring out the
logic to determine the (DNS address record) label for a given IP block
object into the class.

Add new subroutine to Netdot::Model::Ipblock, dns_address_record_label
that returns 'A' or 'AAAA' depending on the version of the object.

Also add in some unit tests.

There is a second location in management/ip.html where we need to set
the label for the DNS address record. This second location in the code
get executed when a new address is created (and there is no "id" passed
in via the arguments of the Mason component.)

The need for a second place to contain logic warrants factoring out the
logic to determine the (DNS address record) label for a given IP block
object into the class.

Add new subroutine to Netdot::Model::Ipblock, dns_address_record_label
that returns 'A' or 'AAAA' depending on the version of the object.

Also add in some unit tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant