Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refine deno task sample:node. #439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Refine deno task sample:node. #439

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

dajiaji
Copy link
Owner

@dajiaji dajiaji commented Oct 18, 2024

No description provided.

@dajiaji dajiaji force-pushed the refine-deno-task-sample-node branch from f42bf39 to a982d7f Compare October 18, 2024 01:51
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.33%. Comparing base (9d67bd5) to head (a982d7f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #439      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.58%   89.33%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files          58       58              
  Lines        4387     4387              
  Branches      414      413       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         3930     3919      -11     
- Misses        456      467      +11     
  Partials        1        1              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.33% <ø> (-0.26%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dajiaji dajiaji merged commit 8a320ef into main Oct 18, 2024
14 checks passed
@dajiaji dajiaji deleted the refine-deno-task-sample-node branch October 18, 2024 04:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants