Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create fit-together.json #530

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create fit-together.json #530

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ben-kaufman
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

"StandAloneContracts": [
{
"name": "ContributionRewardExt",
"address": "0xD598aAd8700bA3c588c3A2d3A43de6C5D69De23b",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why there are 2 ContributionRewardExt?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is only one (note the address is the same for both).
That's "duplicated" because of how the migration deals with the Contribution Reward + Competition interdependency.
It's like that in all daos, see for example https://github.com/daostack/subgraph/blob/master/daos/mainnet/cryptochicks.json

{
"name": "ReputationAdmin",
"alias": "ReputationAdmin",
"address": "0x550F422C14780f64685A0959da12b528531847BA",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the owner of this is 0x06044b5359d8df7886366c22c61c7ecd29becac7 .
who is it ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ben-kaufman ben-kaufman Apr 27, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know, @Theylon should know that.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's the dHack metamask address

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants