Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed deprecated Workflow methods and types from DaprClient and tests #1345

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor

@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo commented Sep 3, 2024

Description

Removed the Workflow methods from the DaprClient, DaprGrpcClient and an end-to-end test as well as a few now-unused types. Also refactored the WorkflowRuntimeStatus enum out from Dapr.Client and into Dapr.Workflow as it has no more purpose in the former project.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #1344

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created/updated tests
  • Extended the documentation

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

@m3nax
Copy link
Contributor

m3nax commented Sep 3, 2024

@WhitWaldo This is pr is related with the incremental source generator for actors #1334?

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@m3nax Nope, apologies - meant to link 1344 and accidentally put 1334 (and did it again while typing this message).

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
// limitations under the License.
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------

namespace Dapr.Client
namespace Dapr.Workflow
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will need to mark this as a breaking change in the release notes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there somewhere this should be marked or just something I should write on a sticky note to add to the draft after the code freeze?

This was in response to #1344 which is being tracked in dapr/dapr#8008

philliphoff
philliphoff previously approved these changes Oct 11, 2024
…ality has been moved out to the Dapr.Workflow project instead.

Signed-off-by: Whit Waldo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove obsolete workflow methods from DaprClient
3 participants