Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enables utils.compare_trees to help debugging #88

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

funkyfuture
Copy link
Contributor

@funkyfuture funkyfuture commented May 13, 2024

I find this actually helpful for developing an XML API's serialization routines.


dear diary, when i worked on this, the LLM that comes with my IDE for a while now actually inferred a useful auto-completion that excels prior methods for the first time. still underwhelming considering the kWh per completion proposal.

@funkyfuture funkyfuture added this to the 0.5 milestone May 13, 2024
@funkyfuture funkyfuture marked this pull request as draft May 13, 2024 18:35
@funkyfuture funkyfuture marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2024 20:27
This serves the purpose to deliver better comprehensible output by
tests.
It's not fully implemented, suffices the internal requirements, and
no obvious other real-world use-case comes to mind.
@funkyfuture
Copy link
Contributor Author

this now sits on top of #91.

@funkyfuture
Copy link
Contributor Author

funkyfuture commented Jul 30, 2024

for the record: the large chunks of uncovered (/-tested) code affect the string representation of encountered differences / errors. thus these code paths aren't reached when the other tests pass, but i've seen it all in action.

@funkyfuture funkyfuture merged commit 2d97256 into main Jul 30, 2024
8 checks passed
@funkyfuture funkyfuture deleted the compare_trees branch July 30, 2024 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants