Fixing Syntax of the GC Pipeline Yaml

[mrsharm]

• Fixing Syntax of the GC Pipeline Yaml.
• Temporarily disable long running examples to get the pipeline running.
• Excluding running the performance pipeline in case no changes are made in the GC Infra.

[LoopedBard3]

@mrsharm it would probably be worth adding the gc-azure-pipelines.yml file to the normal azure-pipelines.yml exclude list, and maybe adding it to the include list of the gc-azure-pipelines.yml file (I am not sure if a yml considers itself as always in the include list or not 🤷‍♂️). This would minimize the noise from the performance scenario runs unrelated to GC in the GC commits.

[mrsharm]

/azp run performance-gc-ci

[azure-pipelines]

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

[mrsharm]

/azp run performance-gc-ci

[azure-pipelines]

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

[mrsharm]

/azp run performance-gc-ci

[azure-pipelines]

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

[mrsharm]

/azp run performance-gc-ci

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[LoopedBard3]

Left one comment. Looks good overall as well.

[LoopedBard3]

This looks good to me 👍.

[mrsharm]

Thanks for all the help, @LoopedBard3 and @DrewScoggins! This PR has got us to test a large part of the notebook functionality and I observe that the tests are all green from the pipeline:

And successfully running the tests: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=822709&view=logs&j=6f2f97bc-132f-5f9d-ae17-411e38c19357

Will follow up with re-enabling the example notebook tests as these are timing out on the lab machines even though successfully running locally.

[LoopedBard3]

Looks good to me.

[DrewScoggins]

LGTM