Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21133] #139

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

richiware
Copy link
Member

@richiware richiware commented Jun 3, 2024

Description

This PR only regenerate the IDL files.

Related implementation PR:

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • N/A Changes do not break current interoperability.
  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
  • N/A Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • CI passes without warnings or errors.

@richiware richiware changed the title TypeObjectRegistry refactor TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21133] Jun 3, 2024
@richiware
Copy link
Member Author

Manual CI passed ✅

@richiware
Copy link
Member Author

[Manual CI] passed ✅

Copy link

@adriancampo adriancampo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <[email protected]>
@richiware richiware force-pushed the feature/type-registry-refactor branch from 5aa3690 to 342bc98 Compare June 13, 2024 08:12
@richiware
Copy link
Member Author

Manual CI passed ✅

@EduPonz EduPonz added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Jun 14, 2024
@EduPonz EduPonz merged commit 7c43098 into master Jun 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@EduPonz EduPonz deleted the feature/type-registry-refactor branch June 14, 2024 05:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants