feat: Workflows for publishing from GH actions #409
Conversation
|
To view this pull requests documentation preview, visit the following URL: docs.page/focustree/starknet.dart~409 Documentation is deployed and generated using docs.page. |
WalkthroughThree new GitHub Actions workflow files have been introduced: Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
.github/workflows/release-publish.yaml (2)
6-11: LGTM: Job configuration is well-defined.The job name, permissions, and runner configuration are appropriate for the task of publishing packages. The 'contents: write' and 'id-token: write' permissions are necessary for updating the repository and authenticating with package registries.
Consider adding a comment explaining the need for the 'id-token: write' permission, as it might not be immediately obvious to all developers why this is required.
16-19: LGTM: Flutter setup and publishing steps are well-configured.The use of
subosito/flutter-action@v2for setting up Flutter andbluefireteam/melos-action@v3for publishing is appropriate. Thepublish: trueparameter correctly triggers the publishing process.Consider adding a step to verify the Flutter version and Dart SDK version before publishing. This can help ensure consistency across different environments. You could add something like:
- name: Verify Flutter version run: flutter --versionThis step would provide valuable information in the workflow logs and can help with debugging if issues arise.
.github/workflows/release-prepare.yaml (2)
11-17: LGTM: Job configuration looks good.The job configuration is well-structured with appropriate permissions set. However, consider pinning the Ubuntu version for better reproducibility.
Consider replacing
ubuntu-latestwith a specific version, e.g.,ubuntu-22.04, to ensure consistent behavior across runs.
23-28: LGTM: Well-configured Melos action for versioning and release preparation.The Melos action is set up effectively with conditional versioning, dry run publishing, and PR creation. This configuration provides a robust release preparation process.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the Melos action and the significance of the
run-versioningandrun-versioning-prereleaseoptions for better maintainability..github/workflows/release-tag.yaml (3)
7-12: Update job name to reflect its purpose.The current job name "publish-packages" doesn't accurately reflect its primary purpose of creating tags for the release.
Consider renaming the job to better match its function:
jobs: create-release-tags: name: Create tags for release # ... rest of the job configurationThis change will make the workflow more self-descriptive and easier to understand at a glance.
15-18: Specify Flutter version for consistency.While the workflow sets up the Flutter environment, it doesn't specify a particular Flutter version. This could potentially lead to inconsistencies if the default version changes.
Consider specifying a Flutter version in the
subosito/flutter-action@v2step:- uses: subosito/flutter-action@v2 with: flutter-version: '3.10.0' # Replace with your desired version channel: 'stable'This ensures that the workflow always uses a consistent Flutter version, reducing the risk of unexpected behavior due to version changes.
19-21: Approve Melos usage and suggest version specification.The use of Melos for managing the monorepo and creating tags is appropriate. However, consider specifying a Melos version for consistency.
You could update the Melos action step as follows:
- uses: bluefireteam/melos-action@v3 with: melos-version: '3.1.0' tag: trueThis ensures that a specific version of Melos is used, maintaining consistency across different runs of the workflow.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/release-prepare.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-publish.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-tag.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/release-publish.yaml (3)
1-3: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are appropriate.The workflow name "Publish packages" clearly describes its purpose, and the manual trigger (
workflow_dispatch) provides control over when package releases are initiated.
13-15: LGTM: Checkout step is correctly configured.The use of the latest version of
actions/checkout(v4) and settingfetch-depth: 0ensures that the entire Git history is available. This is crucial for accurate versioning and generating changelogs during the publishing process.
1-19: Overall, this is a well-structured and appropriate workflow for publishing packages.The workflow is concise, focused, and follows GitHub Actions best practices. It uses up-to-date versions of actions and correctly configures permissions and steps for publishing packages.
A few minor suggestions have been made to enhance clarity and robustness:
- Adding a comment explaining the 'id-token: write' permission.
- Including a step to verify the Flutter and Dart SDK versions.
These suggestions are optional improvements to an already solid workflow.
.github/workflows/release-prepare.yaml (3)
1-9: LGTM: Well-structured workflow trigger configuration.The workflow name is clear, and the manual trigger with an optional
prereleaseinput provides flexibility in the release preparation process.
19-22: LGTM: Proper setup for checkout and Flutter.The checkout action fetches the full history, which is crucial for versioning. The Flutter setup is straightforward and uses a recent action version.
1-28: Overall, this is a well-implemented release preparation workflow.The workflow effectively automates the release preparation process, providing flexibility for both regular and prerelease versions. It uses recent versions of actions and includes important steps such as full history checkout, Flutter setup, and versioning with Melos.
The minor suggestions provided (pinning Ubuntu version and adding comments) would further enhance maintainability and reproducibility, but the current implementation is already solid and ready for use.
Summary by CodeRabbit