Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Safe-navigate to session flusher #2396

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ixti
Copy link

@ixti ixti commented Sep 2, 2024

Sentry.session_flusher is nil-able. And under some circumstances (which I still can't figure out) in specs it's nil causing our spec suite randomly (but as of recent, pretty all the time) fail.

Example failure

     Failure/Error: post(path, env:, headers:, xhr: true)
     
     NoMethodError:
       undefined method `add_session' for nil
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry/hub.rb:251:in `end_session'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry/hub.rb:260:in `with_session_tracking'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry-ruby.rb:411:in `with_session_tracking'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry/rack/capture_exceptions.rb:21:in `block in call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry/hub.rb:59:in `with_scope'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry-ruby.rb:391:in `with_scope'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/sentry-ruby-5.19.0/lib/sentry/rack/capture_exceptions.rb:20:in `call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rails_semantic_logger-4.17.0/lib/rails_semantic_logger/rack/logger.rb:45:in `call_app'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rails_semantic_logger-4.17.0/lib/rails_semantic_logger/rack/logger.rb:26:in `block in call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/bundler/gems/semantic_logger-093c0258b053/lib/semantic_logger/base.rb:190:in `block in tagged'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/bundler/gems/semantic_logger-093c0258b053/lib/semantic_logger/semantic_logger.rb:395:in `named_tagged'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/bundler/gems/semantic_logger-093c0258b053/lib/semantic_logger/base.rb:197:in `tagged'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rails_semantic_logger-4.17.0/lib/rails_semantic_logger/rack/logger.rb:26:in `call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rack-3.1.7/lib/rack/runtime.rb:24:in `call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rack-3.1.7/lib/rack/sendfile.rb:114:in `call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rack-cors-2.0.2/lib/rack/cors.rb:102:in `call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/railties-7.2.1/lib/rails/engine.rb:535:in `call'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rack-test-2.1.0/lib/rack/test.rb:360:in `process_request'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/rack-test-2.1.0/lib/rack/test.rb:153:in `request'
     # ./spec/support/helpers/protobufable_test_helper.rb:76:in `rpc'
     # ./spec/requests/asgard/auth_controller_spec.rb:220:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # /home/ixti/.gem/ruby/3.3.4/gems/webmock-3.23.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

RSpec Config (Sentry related)

require "sentry/test_helper"

RSpec.configure do |config|
  config.include Sentry::TestHelper
  config.before { setup_sentry_test }
  config.after { teardown_sentry_test }
end

Workaround

As a workaround, we just disabled session tracking:

Sentry.init do |config|
  # ...

  # See: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-ruby/pull/2337
  config.excluded_exceptions << "Sidekiq::JobRetry::Handled"

  # See: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-ruby/pull/2396
  config.auto_session_tracking = false

  # ...
end

Resolves: #2378

@ixti
Copy link
Author

ixti commented Sep 2, 2024

We tried and it still fails:

require "sentry/test_helper"

RSpec.configure do |config|
  config.include Sentry::TestHelper

  config.before do
    setup_sentry_test { _1.auto_session_tracking = true }
  end

  config.after { teardown_sentry_test }
end

@st0012
Copy link
Collaborator

st0012 commented Sep 15, 2024

Thanks for reporting the issue. It does look very puzzling as the only method that could nullify the session flusher is Sentry.close. Can you do a quick search to see if it's called anywhere in the test suite or codebase?

@MrSerth
Copy link
Contributor

MrSerth commented Oct 10, 2024

I am experiencing the same issue on production and hence reported #2378. Currently, the issue appears rather frequent for us, but not for each request:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-10-10 um 20 15 26

Is there any chance I could help to get this merged and released? Without a fix, each occurrence ends up with a 500 Internal Server Error and hides actually errors. I would rather miss a session tracing than having those errors.

In our app, we never call Sentry.close ourselves.

@ixti
Copy link
Author

ixti commented Oct 18, 2024

Thanks for reporting the issue. It does look very puzzling as the only method that could nullify the session flusher is Sentry.close. Can you do a quick search to see if it's called anywhere in the test suite or codebase?

We don't call Sentry.close anywhere.

@solnic
Copy link
Collaborator

solnic commented Oct 18, 2024

Could you grab sentry from solnic/make-closing-thread-safe branch and see if the crash is gone?

@MrSerth
Copy link
Contributor

MrSerth commented Oct 19, 2024

Could you grab sentry from solnic/make-closing-thread-safe branch and see if the crash is gone?

I tried the branch, but since we modified the codebase (where this issue normally occurred) a lot recently, I wasn't able to confirm the fix is working. Sorry for not being able to help out here. Maybe it's still valid to merge this PR using the safe navigation operator?

@ixti
Copy link
Author

ixti commented Oct 27, 2024

We also took a workaround way by disabling session tracking completely. And even if we go back, the bug is pretty sporadic, to being able to tell if the patch in solnic/make-closing-thread-safe fixes the bug or no.

@solnic
Copy link
Collaborator

solnic commented Oct 28, 2024

Thanks folks. Would it be possible for you to disable your workarounds after we release a new version and see if it helped. The proposed fix here comes with a risk that it will silence actual failures where the session_flusher should really be there. It's kinda hard to tell which option would be worse but given that the fix addresses an edge case by making a change that may result in breaking more common cases (an actual misconfiguration of Sentry), then it's probably better not to apply the fix.

@MrSerth
Copy link
Contributor

MrSerth commented Oct 28, 2024

As written above, I already tested the branch and partially reverted some of the code changes I considered to have the most impact on this issue.

While I understand your concern, this issue (and especially the one discussed in #2428) may hide actually bugs from our code base as Sentry customers -- that happened at least for us. We would normally trust in the Sentry error reporting, but when this bug occurs, we lack any notification and insights on actual defects of our software. Hence, from our perspective, it is far less critical to miss some sessions than to miss the actual bug that occurred.

@solnic
Copy link
Collaborator

solnic commented Oct 28, 2024

As written above, I already tested the branch and partially reverted some of the code changes I considered to have the most impact on this issue.

Gotcha, thank you!

While I understand your concern, this issue (and especially the one discussed in #2428) may hide actually bugs from our code base as Sentry customers -- that happened at least for us. We would normally trust in the Sentry error reporting, but when this bug occurs, we lack any notification and insights on actual defects of our software. Hence, from our perspective, it is far less critical to miss some sessions than to miss the actual bug that occurred.

Alright, given that Hub is going away eventually (see #1495 (comment)) we can just rely on the workarounds here and in your PR for the time being. Thanks for all your input and help with this btw!

@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ def end_session

return unless session
session.close
Sentry.session_flusher.add_session(session)
Sentry.session_flusher&.add_session(session)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a comment pointing to the related issue so that it's clear why we're doing this? 🙏🏻

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will do so shortly.

@ixti
Copy link
Author

ixti commented Oct 29, 2024

Would it be possible for you to disable your workarounds after we release a new version and see if it helped.

Sure, we will give it a try!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NoMethodError: undefined method add_session for nil
4 participants