Refactor update_comment()

[hiroshinishio]

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Refactor the update_comment function to use base_args for passing parameters, simplifying the function signature and improving code readability.

[sentry-io]

🔍 Existing Issues For Review

Your pull request is modifying functions with the following pre-existing issues:

📄 File: services/check_run_handler.py

Function	Unhandled Issue
handle_check_run	IndexError: list index out of range /webhook Event Count: 79
handle_check_run	KeyError: 'pull_requests' /webhook Event Count: 2
handle_check_run	KeyError: 'owner' /webhook Event Count: 2
handle_check_run	KeyError: 'update_github_comment' /webhook Event Count: 1

---

_{Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎}

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @hiroshinishio - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider preserving some of the detailed error handling from update_comment_for_raised_errors(), particularly for HTTP 422 status codes, to maintain debugging capabilities in production. The current simplification might make troubleshooting more difficult.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sentry-io]

Suspect Issues

This pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:

• ‼️ ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 4, got 3) /jira-webhook View Issue

_{Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎}