Noto Serif JP: Version 2.001-H2 added #6020

simoncozens · 2023-03-14T13:09:17Z

No description provided.

github-actions · 2023-03-14T13:20:06Z

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.8.11

[1] Family checks

ℹ INFO: Check axis ordering on the STAT table. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT/axis_order)

ℹ INFO From a total of 1 font files, 0 of them (0.00%) lack a STAT table.

And these are the most common STAT axis orderings:
('wght', 1) [code: summary]

[33] NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf

🔥 FAIL: Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage)

🔥 FAIL Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS)
- 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
- 0x0104 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH OGONEK)
- 0x0106 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH ACUTE)
- 0x010C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CARON)
- 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x010E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CARON)
- 0x0116 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x0118 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH OGONEK)
- 0x011E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE)
- 93 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 FAIL: Check license file has good copyright string. (com.google.fonts/check/license/OFL_copyright)

🔥 FAIL First line in license file is:

which does not match the expected format, similar to:

🔥 FAIL: Ensure files are not too large. (com.google.fonts/check/file_size)

🔥 FAIL Font file is 13.0Mb, larger than limit 9.0Mb [code: massive-font]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name value should be same as the family name declared on the name table. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/font_name)

🔥 FAIL Unmatched familyname in font: TTF has familyname = "Noto Serif JP ExtraLight" while METADATA.pb has font.name = "Noto Serif JP". [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name field contains font name in right format? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_name_values)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb font.name field ("Noto Serif JP") does not match correct font name format ("Noto Serif JP ExtraLight"). [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in METADATA.pb (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_copyright)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to:
"Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with reserved font name 'source'." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts (com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright)

🔥 FAIL Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/consistent_repo_urls)

🔥 FAIL Value of repository_url field is

But font copyright string has: http://www.adobe.com/
[code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb matches all copyright notice entries on the name table ? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/copyright)

🔥 FAIL Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Check font follows the Google Fonts CJK vertical metric schema (com.google.fonts/check/cjk_vertical_metrics)

🔥 FAIL hhea.ascent must match OS/2.usWinAscent [code: ascent-mismatch]
🔥 FAIL hhea.descent must match absolute value of OS/2.usWinDescent [code: descent-mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designers are listed correctly on the Google Fonts catalog? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/designer_profiles)

🔥 FAIL The avatar filename provided seems to be incorrect: (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/fonts/master/catalog/designers/google/) [code: bad-avatar-filename]

🔥 FAIL: Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks. (com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:
- acutecomb
- gravecomb
- uni0307
- uni030C [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]

⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table? (com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url)

⚠ WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]

⚠ WARN: Copyright notice on METADATA.pb should not contain 'Reserved Font Name'. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/reserved_font_name)

⚠ WARN METADATA.pb: copyright field ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") contains "Reserved Font Name". This is an error except in a few specific rare cases. [code: rfn]

⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature? (com.google.fonts/check/ligature_carets)

⚠ WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences? (com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f
- f + i
- i + f
- f + l
- l + f
- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

⚠ WARN: Combined length of family and style must not exceed 27 characters. (com.google.fonts/check/name/family_and_style_max_length)

⚠ WARN The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries:
FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif JP ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at fonttools/fontbakery#2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

⚠ WARN: A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts (com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts)

⚠ WARN Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags)

⚠ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠ WARN: Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- glyph00603
- glyph01006
- glyph01665
- glyph01667
- glyph01669
- glyph01670
- glyph01675
- glyph01683
- glyph01685
- glyph01688
- 78 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
[code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain a soft hyphen? (com.google.fonts/check/soft_hyphen)

⚠ WARN This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain chws and vchw features? (com.google.fonts/check/cjk_chws_feature)

⚠ WARN chws feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-chws-feature]
⚠ WARN vchw feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-vchw-feature]

⚠ WARN: Detect any interpolation issues in the font. (com.google.fonts/check/interpolation_issues)

⚠ WARN Interpolation issues were found in the font: - Contour 2 start point differs in glyph 'uni2299' between location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7fb4463084f0> and location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7fb44630bcd0> [code: interpolation-issues]

⚠ WARN: Check math signs have the same width. (com.google.fonts/check/math_signs_width)

⚠ WARN The most common width is 1000 among a set of 43 math glyphs.
The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

Width = 571:
minus, greater, logicalnot, equal, plus, less
[code: width-outliers]

⚠ WARN: Font has correct post table version? (com.google.fonts/check/post_table_version)

⚠ WARN Post table format 3 use has niche use case problems.Please review the check rationale for additional details. [code: post-table-version]

⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class. (com.google.fonts/check/gdef_mark_chars)

⚠ WARN The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class:
uni0304 (U+0304), uni20DD (U+20DD), uni20DE (U+20DE), uni302A (U+302A), uni302B (U+302B), uni302C (U+302C), uni302D (U+302D), uni3099 (U+3099) and uni309A (U+309A) [code: mark-chars]

ℹ INFO: Show hinting filesize impact. (com.google.fonts/check/hinting_impact)

ℹ INFO Hinting filesize impact:

	ofl/notoserifjp/NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size	13.0Mb
Hinted Size	13.0Mb
Increase	24 bytes
Change	0.0 %
[code: size-impact]

ℹ INFO: Font has old ttfautohint applied? (com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint)

ℹ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: ['Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0'] [code: version-not-detected]

ℹ INFO: EPAR table present in font? (com.google.fonts/check/epar)

ℹ INFO EPAR table not present in font. To learn more see When missing EPAR table, just emit INFO alert fonttools/fontbakery#818 [code: lacks-EPAR]

ℹ INFO: Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (com.google.fonts/check/gasp)

ℹ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

PPM <= 65535:
flag = 0x0F
- Use grid-fitting
- Use grayscale rendering
- Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing
- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]

ℹ INFO: Check for font-v versioning. (com.google.fonts/check/fontv)

ℹ INFO Version string is: "Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0"
The version string must ideally include a git commit hash and either a "dev" or a "release" suffix such as in the example below:
"Version 1.3; git-0d08353-release" [code: bad-format]

ℹ INFO: Font contains all required tables? (com.google.fonts/check/required_tables)

ℹ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
- loca
- prep
- BASE
- GPOS
- GSUB
- gasp
- vhea
- vmtx [code: optional-tables]

ℹ INFO: List all superfamily filepaths (com.google.fonts/check/superfamily/list)

ℹ INFO ofl/notoserifjp [code: family-path]

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	12	14	48	8	160	0
0%	5%	6%	20%	3%	66%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
PASS
DEBUG

simoncozens · 2023-03-14T13:28:25Z

~~There may be a small vertical metrics issue here; just checking.~~ Fixed in latest push.

github-actions · 2023-03-14T14:25:34Z

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.8.11

[1] Family checks

ℹ INFO: Check axis ordering on the STAT table. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT/axis_order)

ℹ INFO From a total of 1 font files, 0 of them (0.00%) lack a STAT table.

And these are the most common STAT axis orderings:
('wght', 1) [code: summary]

[32] NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf

🔥 FAIL: Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage)

🔥 FAIL Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS)
- 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
- 0x0104 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH OGONEK)
- 0x0106 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH ACUTE)
- 0x010C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CARON)
- 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x010E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CARON)
- 0x0116 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x0118 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH OGONEK)
- 0x011E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE)
- 93 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 FAIL: Check license file has good copyright string. (com.google.fonts/check/license/OFL_copyright)

🔥 FAIL First line in license file is:

which does not match the expected format, similar to:

🔥 FAIL: Ensure files are not too large. (com.google.fonts/check/file_size)

🔥 FAIL Font file is 13.0Mb, larger than limit 9.0Mb [code: massive-font]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name value should be same as the family name declared on the name table. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/font_name)

🔥 FAIL Unmatched familyname in font: TTF has familyname = "Noto Serif JP ExtraLight" while METADATA.pb has font.name = "Noto Serif JP". [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name field contains font name in right format? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_name_values)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb font.name field ("Noto Serif JP") does not match correct font name format ("Noto Serif JP ExtraLight"). [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in METADATA.pb (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_copyright)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to:
"Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with reserved font name 'source'." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts (com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright)

🔥 FAIL Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/consistent_repo_urls)

🔥 FAIL Value of repository_url field is

But font copyright string has: http://www.adobe.com/
[code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb matches all copyright notice entries on the name table ? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/copyright)

🔥 FAIL Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designers are listed correctly on the Google Fonts catalog? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/designer_profiles)

🔥 FAIL The avatar filename provided seems to be incorrect: (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/fonts/master/catalog/designers/google/) [code: bad-avatar-filename]

🔥 FAIL: Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks. (com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:
- acutecomb
- gravecomb
- uni0307
- uni030C [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]

⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table? (com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url)

⚠ WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]

⚠ WARN: Copyright notice on METADATA.pb should not contain 'Reserved Font Name'. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/reserved_font_name)

⚠ WARN METADATA.pb: copyright field ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") contains "Reserved Font Name". This is an error except in a few specific rare cases. [code: rfn]

⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature? (com.google.fonts/check/ligature_carets)

⚠ WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences? (com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f
- f + i
- i + f
- f + l
- l + f
- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

⚠ WARN: Combined length of family and style must not exceed 27 characters. (com.google.fonts/check/name/family_and_style_max_length)

⚠ WARN The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries:
FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif JP ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at fonttools/fontbakery#2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

⚠ WARN: A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts (com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts)

⚠ WARN Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags)

⚠ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠ WARN: Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- glyph00603
- glyph01006
- glyph01665
- glyph01667
- glyph01669
- glyph01670
- glyph01675
- glyph01683
- glyph01685
- glyph01688
- 78 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
[code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain a soft hyphen? (com.google.fonts/check/soft_hyphen)

⚠ WARN This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain chws and vchw features? (com.google.fonts/check/cjk_chws_feature)

⚠ WARN chws feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-chws-feature]
⚠ WARN vchw feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-vchw-feature]

⚠ WARN: Detect any interpolation issues in the font. (com.google.fonts/check/interpolation_issues)

⚠ WARN Interpolation issues were found in the font: - Contour 2 start point differs in glyph 'uni2299' between location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7fa5682b6200> and location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7fa5682b6590> [code: interpolation-issues]

⚠ WARN: Check math signs have the same width. (com.google.fonts/check/math_signs_width)

⚠ WARN The most common width is 1000 among a set of 43 math glyphs.
The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

Width = 571:
logicalnot, equal, greater, plus, less, minus
[code: width-outliers]

⚠ WARN: Font has correct post table version? (com.google.fonts/check/post_table_version)

⚠ WARN Post table format 3 use has niche use case problems.Please review the check rationale for additional details. [code: post-table-version]

⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class. (com.google.fonts/check/gdef_mark_chars)

⚠ WARN The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class:
uni0304 (U+0304), uni20DD (U+20DD), uni20DE (U+20DE), uni302A (U+302A), uni302B (U+302B), uni302C (U+302C), uni302D (U+302D), uni3099 (U+3099) and uni309A (U+309A) [code: mark-chars]

ℹ INFO: Show hinting filesize impact. (com.google.fonts/check/hinting_impact)

ℹ INFO Hinting filesize impact:

	ofl/notoserifjp/NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size	13.0Mb
Hinted Size	13.0Mb
Increase	24 bytes
Change	0.0 %
[code: size-impact]

ℹ INFO: Font has old ttfautohint applied? (com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint)

ℹ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: ['Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0'] [code: version-not-detected]

ℹ INFO: EPAR table present in font? (com.google.fonts/check/epar)

ℹ INFO EPAR table not present in font. To learn more see When missing EPAR table, just emit INFO alert fonttools/fontbakery#818 [code: lacks-EPAR]

ℹ INFO: Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (com.google.fonts/check/gasp)

ℹ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

PPM <= 65535:
flag = 0x0F
- Use grid-fitting
- Use grayscale rendering
- Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing
- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]

ℹ INFO: Check for font-v versioning. (com.google.fonts/check/fontv)

ℹ INFO Version string is: "Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0"
The version string must ideally include a git commit hash and either a "dev" or a "release" suffix such as in the example below:
"Version 1.3; git-0d08353-release" [code: bad-format]

ℹ INFO: Font contains all required tables? (com.google.fonts/check/required_tables)

ℹ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
- loca
- prep
- BASE
- GPOS
- GSUB
- gasp
- vhea
- vmtx [code: optional-tables]

ℹ INFO: List all superfamily filepaths (com.google.fonts/check/superfamily/list)

ℹ INFO ofl/notoserifjp [code: family-path]

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	11	14	48	8	161	0
0%	5%	6%	20%	3%	67%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
PASS
DEBUG

github-actions · 2023-03-14T15:30:03Z

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.8.11

[1] Family checks

ℹ INFO: Check axis ordering on the STAT table. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT/axis_order)

ℹ INFO From a total of 1 font files, 0 of them (0.00%) lack a STAT table.

And these are the most common STAT axis orderings:
('wght', 1) [code: summary]

[32] NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf

🔥 FAIL: Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage)

🔥 FAIL Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS)
- 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
- 0x0104 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH OGONEK)
- 0x0106 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH ACUTE)
- 0x010C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CARON)
- 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x010E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CARON)
- 0x0116 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x0118 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH OGONEK)
- 0x011E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE)
- 93 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 FAIL: Check license file has good copyright string. (com.google.fonts/check/license/OFL_copyright)

🔥 FAIL First line in license file is:

which does not match the expected format, similar to:

🔥 FAIL: Ensure files are not too large. (com.google.fonts/check/file_size)

🔥 FAIL Font file is 13.0Mb, larger than limit 9.0Mb [code: massive-font]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name value should be same as the family name declared on the name table. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/font_name)

🔥 FAIL Unmatched familyname in font: TTF has familyname = "Noto Serif JP ExtraLight" while METADATA.pb has font.name = "Noto Serif JP". [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name field contains font name in right format? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_name_values)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb font.name field ("Noto Serif JP") does not match correct font name format ("Noto Serif JP ExtraLight"). [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in METADATA.pb (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_copyright)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to:
"Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with reserved font name 'source'." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts (com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright)

🔥 FAIL Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/consistent_repo_urls)

🔥 FAIL Value of repository_url field is

But font copyright string has: http://www.adobe.com/
[code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb matches all copyright notice entries on the name table ? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/copyright)

🔥 FAIL Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designers are listed correctly on the Google Fonts catalog? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/designer_profiles)

🔥 FAIL The avatar filename provided seems to be incorrect: (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/fonts/master/catalog/designers/google/) [code: bad-avatar-filename]

🔥 FAIL: Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks. (com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:
- acutecomb
- gravecomb
- uni0307
- uni030C [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]

⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table? (com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url)

⚠ WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]

⚠ WARN: Copyright notice on METADATA.pb should not contain 'Reserved Font Name'. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/reserved_font_name)

⚠ WARN METADATA.pb: copyright field ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") contains "Reserved Font Name". This is an error except in a few specific rare cases. [code: rfn]

⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature? (com.google.fonts/check/ligature_carets)

⚠ WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences? (com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f
- f + i
- i + f
- f + l
- l + f
- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

⚠ WARN: Combined length of family and style must not exceed 27 characters. (com.google.fonts/check/name/family_and_style_max_length)

⚠ WARN The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries:
FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif JP ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at fonttools/fontbakery#2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

⚠ WARN: A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts (com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts)

⚠ WARN Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags)

⚠ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠ WARN: Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- glyph00603
- glyph01006
- glyph01665
- glyph01667
- glyph01669
- glyph01670
- glyph01675
- glyph01683
- glyph01685
- glyph01688
- 78 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
[code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain a soft hyphen? (com.google.fonts/check/soft_hyphen)

⚠ WARN This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain chws and vchw features? (com.google.fonts/check/cjk_chws_feature)

⚠ WARN chws feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-chws-feature]
⚠ WARN vchw feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-vchw-feature]

⚠ WARN: Detect any interpolation issues in the font. (com.google.fonts/check/interpolation_issues)

⚠ WARN Interpolation issues were found in the font: - Contour 2 start point differs in glyph 'uni2299' between location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7fb48a24dde0> and location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7fb48a24ffd0> [code: interpolation-issues]

⚠ WARN: Check math signs have the same width. (com.google.fonts/check/math_signs_width)

⚠ WARN The most common width is 1000 among a set of 43 math glyphs.
The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

Width = 571:
logicalnot, minus, plus, equal, less, greater
[code: width-outliers]

⚠ WARN: Font has correct post table version? (com.google.fonts/check/post_table_version)

⚠ WARN Post table format 3 use has niche use case problems.Please review the check rationale for additional details. [code: post-table-version]

⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class. (com.google.fonts/check/gdef_mark_chars)

⚠ WARN The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class:
uni0304 (U+0304), uni20DD (U+20DD), uni20DE (U+20DE), uni302A (U+302A), uni302B (U+302B), uni302C (U+302C), uni302D (U+302D), uni3099 (U+3099) and uni309A (U+309A) [code: mark-chars]

ℹ INFO: Show hinting filesize impact. (com.google.fonts/check/hinting_impact)

ℹ INFO Hinting filesize impact:

	ofl/notoserifjp/NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size	13.0Mb
Hinted Size	13.0Mb
Increase	24 bytes
Change	0.0 %
[code: size-impact]

ℹ INFO: Font has old ttfautohint applied? (com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint)

ℹ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: ['Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0'] [code: version-not-detected]

ℹ INFO: EPAR table present in font? (com.google.fonts/check/epar)

ℹ INFO EPAR table not present in font. To learn more see When missing EPAR table, just emit INFO alert fonttools/fontbakery#818 [code: lacks-EPAR]

ℹ INFO: Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (com.google.fonts/check/gasp)

ℹ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

PPM <= 65535:
flag = 0x0F
- Use grid-fitting
- Use grayscale rendering
- Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing
- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]

ℹ INFO: Check for font-v versioning. (com.google.fonts/check/fontv)

ℹ INFO Version string is: "Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0"
The version string must ideally include a git commit hash and either a "dev" or a "release" suffix such as in the example below:
"Version 1.3; git-0d08353-release" [code: bad-format]

ℹ INFO: Font contains all required tables? (com.google.fonts/check/required_tables)

ℹ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
- loca
- prep
- BASE
- GPOS
- GSUB
- gasp
- vhea
- vmtx [code: optional-tables]

ℹ INFO: List all superfamily filepaths (com.google.fonts/check/superfamily/list)

ℹ INFO ofl/notoserifjp [code: family-path]

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	11	14	48	8	161	0
0%	5%	6%	20%	3%	67%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
PASS
DEBUG

github-actions · 2023-03-15T10:38:00Z

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.8.11

[1] Family checks

ℹ INFO: Check axis ordering on the STAT table. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT/axis_order)

ℹ INFO From a total of 1 font files, 0 of them (0.00%) lack a STAT table.

And these are the most common STAT axis orderings:
('wght', 1) [code: summary]

[32] NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf

🔥 FAIL: Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage)

🔥 FAIL Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS)
- 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
- 0x0104 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH OGONEK)
- 0x0106 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH ACUTE)
- 0x010C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CARON)
- 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x010E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CARON)
- 0x0116 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE)
- 0x0118 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH OGONEK)
- 0x011E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE)
- 93 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 FAIL: Check license file has good copyright string. (com.google.fonts/check/license/OFL_copyright)

🔥 FAIL First line in license file is:

which does not match the expected format, similar to:

🔥 FAIL: Ensure files are not too large. (com.google.fonts/check/file_size)

🔥 FAIL Font file is 13.0Mb, larger than limit 9.0Mb [code: massive-font]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name value should be same as the family name declared on the name table. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/font_name)

🔥 FAIL Unmatched familyname in font: TTF has familyname = "Noto Serif JP ExtraLight" while METADATA.pb has font.name = "Noto Serif JP". [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb font.name field contains font name in right format? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_name_values)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb font.name field ("Noto Serif JP") does not match correct font name format ("Noto Serif JP ExtraLight"). [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in METADATA.pb (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_copyright)

🔥 FAIL METADATA.pb: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to:
"Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with reserved font name 'source'." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts (com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright)

🔥 FAIL Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)"
But instead we have got:
"(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/consistent_repo_urls)

🔥 FAIL Value of repository_url field is

But font copyright string has: http://www.adobe.com/
[code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb matches all copyright notice entries on the name table ? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/copyright)

🔥 FAIL Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/)." [code: mismatch]

🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designers are listed correctly on the Google Fonts catalog? (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/designer_profiles)

🔥 FAIL The avatar filename provided seems to be incorrect: (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/fonts/master/catalog/designers/google/) [code: bad-avatar-filename]

🔥 FAIL: Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks. (com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:
- acutecomb
- gravecomb
- uni0307
- uni030C [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]

⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table? (com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url)

⚠ WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]

⚠ WARN: Copyright notice on METADATA.pb should not contain 'Reserved Font Name'. (com.google.fonts/check/metadata/reserved_font_name)

⚠ WARN METADATA.pb: copyright field ("(c) 2017-2022 Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/) with Reserved Font Name 'Source'.") contains "Reserved Font Name". This is an error except in a few specific rare cases. [code: rfn]

⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature? (com.google.fonts/check/ligature_carets)

⚠ WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences? (com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f
- f + i
- i + f
- f + l
- l + f
- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

⚠ WARN: Combined length of family and style must not exceed 27 characters. (com.google.fonts/check/name/family_and_style_max_length)

⚠ WARN The combined length of family and style exceeds 27 chars in the following 'WINDOWS' entries:
FONT_FAMILY_NAME = 'Noto Serif JP ExtraLight' / SUBFAMILY_NAME = 'Regular'

Please take a look at the conversation at fonttools/fontbakery#2179 in order to understand the reasoning behind these name table records max-length criteria. [code: too-long]

⚠ WARN: A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts (com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts)

⚠ WARN Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags)

⚠ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠ WARN: Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- glyph00603
- glyph01006
- glyph01665
- glyph01667
- glyph01669
- glyph01670
- glyph01675
- glyph01683
- glyph01685
- glyph01688
- 78 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
[code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain a soft hyphen? (com.google.fonts/check/soft_hyphen)

⚠ WARN This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

⚠ WARN: Does the font contain chws and vchw features? (com.google.fonts/check/cjk_chws_feature)

⚠ WARN chws feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-chws-feature]
⚠ WARN vchw feature not found in font. Use chws_tool (https://github.com/googlefonts/chws_tool) to add it. [code: missing-vchw-feature]

⚠ WARN: Detect any interpolation issues in the font. (com.google.fonts/check/interpolation_issues)

⚠ WARN Interpolation issues were found in the font: - Contour 2 start point differs in glyph 'uni2299' between location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7f10a8b4d2a0> and location <fontTools.ttLib.ttGlyphSet._TTGlyphSetGlyf object at 0x7f10a8b4dba0> [code: interpolation-issues]

⚠ WARN: Check math signs have the same width. (com.google.fonts/check/math_signs_width)

⚠ WARN The most common width is 1000 among a set of 43 math glyphs.
The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

Width = 571:
logicalnot, less, plus, equal, minus, greater
[code: width-outliers]

⚠ WARN: Font has correct post table version? (com.google.fonts/check/post_table_version)

⚠ WARN Post table format 3 use has niche use case problems.Please review the check rationale for additional details. [code: post-table-version]

⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class. (com.google.fonts/check/gdef_mark_chars)

⚠ WARN The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class:
uni0304 (U+0304), uni20DD (U+20DD), uni20DE (U+20DE), uni302A (U+302A), uni302B (U+302B), uni302C (U+302C), uni302D (U+302D), uni3099 (U+3099) and uni309A (U+309A) [code: mark-chars]

ℹ INFO: Show hinting filesize impact. (com.google.fonts/check/hinting_impact)

ℹ INFO Hinting filesize impact:

	ofl/notoserifjp/NotoSerifJP[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size	13.0Mb
Hinted Size	13.0Mb
Increase	24 bytes
Change	0.0 %
[code: size-impact]

ℹ INFO: Font has old ttfautohint applied? (com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint)

ℹ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: ['Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0'] [code: version-not-detected]

ℹ INFO: EPAR table present in font? (com.google.fonts/check/epar)

ℹ INFO EPAR table not present in font. To learn more see When missing EPAR table, just emit INFO alert fonttools/fontbakery#818 [code: lacks-EPAR]

ℹ INFO: Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (com.google.fonts/check/gasp)

ℹ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

PPM <= 65535:
flag = 0x0F
- Use grid-fitting
- Use grayscale rendering
- Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing
- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]

ℹ INFO: Check for font-v versioning. (com.google.fonts/check/fontv)

ℹ INFO Version string is: "Version 2.001-H2;hotconv 1.1.0;makeotfexe 2.6.0"
The version string must ideally include a git commit hash and either a "dev" or a "release" suffix such as in the example below:
"Version 1.3; git-0d08353-release" [code: bad-format]

ℹ INFO: Font contains all required tables? (com.google.fonts/check/required_tables)

ℹ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
- loca
- prep
- BASE
- GPOS
- GSUB
- gasp
- vhea
- vmtx [code: optional-tables]

ℹ INFO: List all superfamily filepaths (com.google.fonts/check/superfamily/list)

ℹ INFO ofl/notoserifjp [code: family-path]

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	11	14	48	8	161	0
0%	5%	6%	20%	3%	67%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
PASS
DEBUG

m4rc1e

non-CJK scripts have changed. Latin and Cyrillic is touch looser
Color of Hiragana glyphs is worse

m4rc1e · 2023-03-15T11:15:26Z

Rendering on Windows is a touch lighter now.

old:

new:

i reckon this is due to changing the format from otf to ttf.

simoncozens · 2023-03-15T11:21:11Z

I agree that the colour of the hiragana looks worse (especially に, こ and た) in that browser sample. However, I wonder if something odd is going on with rendering. We will have lost hinting with the change from OTF static to TTF VF. It renders fine using hb-view and Cairo:

wght=100

wght=400

m4rc1e · 2023-03-15T11:25:08Z

There are slight glyph changes which appear to be ok when skimming. However, judging 65k glyphs is insane. I'm wondering if we can do something we OCR to help assist us. I wouldn't mind exploring this at some point.

cc @chrissimpkins

m4rc1e · 2023-03-15T11:26:20Z

However, I wonder if something odd is going on with rendering.

@simoncozens the screenshots were taken from mac OS X. I've noticed this fading problem when a glyph has duplicate outlines or the curve direction is wrong.

simoncozens · 2023-03-15T11:46:38Z

This seems to be a problem with Adobe's variable font conversion. Here is Adobe's static OTF builds (odd line is Serif/OTF/Japanese/NotoSerifCJKjp-Regular.otf) versus their variable OTF builds (even line is Serif/Variable/OTF/NotoSerifCJKjp-VF.otf) (i.e. both CFF):

m4rc1e · 2023-03-15T15:50:33Z

@simoncozens I'm curious, has the Latin, Greek and Cyrillic been taken from #4956?

Shall we also send this back to Adobe so they can fix the color?

simoncozens · 2023-03-15T16:42:46Z

@simoncozens I'm curious, has the Latin, Greek and Cyrillic been taken from #4956?

No, I don't think they would use Noto for this; the upstream is Source Han Serif, which uses Source Serif as its LGC.

Shall we also send this back to Adobe so they can fix the color?

We can raise an issue with them, certainly. I'd check with @chrissimpkins before working out whether to delay because of this; I'm not totally aware where the desire to upgrade Noto Serif CJK came from and if there's any urgency to it.

simoncozens · 2023-03-17T15:02:03Z

We can raise an issue with them, certainly.

adobe-fonts/source-han-serif#182

simoncozens · 2023-03-20T11:10:39Z

the curve direction is wrong.

Bingo. adobe-fonts/source-han-serif#182 (comment)

simoncozens added II CJK Chinese, Japanese, Korean scripts - Ready for Review I Font Upgrade labels Mar 14, 2023

simoncozens added - In Progress and removed - Ready for Review labels Mar 14, 2023

Noto Serif JP hotfix2

5747035

simoncozens force-pushed the NotoSerifJP-hotfix2 branch from 38890ef to 5747035 Compare March 14, 2023 14:16

simoncozens added - Ready for Review and removed - In Progress labels Mar 14, 2023

m4rc1e mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2023

fonts_from_zip: get otfs as well googlefonts/gftools#666

Merged

simoncozens mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2023

Update Noto Serif CJK fonts to variable (summary) #6024

Closed

m4rc1e reviewed Mar 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

RosaWagner mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2023

Noto Serif JP: Version 2.004-H1 added #5343

Closed

RosaWagner added -- Upstream is working on it Designer is making changes in the upstream repo and removed - Ready for Review labels Mar 23, 2023

simoncozens linked an issue Mar 23, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request

Update Noto Serif CJK fonts to variable (summary) #6024

Closed

simoncozens closed this Sep 11, 2023

RosaWagner removed the -- Upstream is working on it Designer is making changes in the upstream repo label Oct 4, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Noto Serif JP: Version 2.001-H2 added #6020

Noto Serif JP: Version 2.001-H2 added #6020

simoncozens commented Mar 14, 2023

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2023

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2023

github-actions bot commented Mar 15, 2023

m4rc1e left a comment

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 17, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 20, 2023

Noto Serif JP: Version 2.001-H2 added #6020

Noto Serif JP: Version 2.001-H2 added #6020

Conversation

simoncozens commented Mar 14, 2023

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2023

Fontbakery report

Summary

simoncozens commented Mar 14, 2023 • edited Loading

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2023

Fontbakery report

Summary

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2023

Fontbakery report

Summary

github-actions bot commented Mar 15, 2023

Fontbakery report

Summary

m4rc1e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023 • edited Loading

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023 • edited Loading

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 17, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 20, 2023

simoncozens commented Mar 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

simoncozens commented Mar 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

m4rc1e commented Mar 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading