Second working port to Rollup

.editorconfig

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+root = true
+
+[*]
+charset = utf-8
+end_of_line = crlf
+indent_size = 2
+indent_style = space
+insert_final_newline = true
+max_line_length = 80
+tab_width = 2
+trim_trailing_whitespace = true
+
+[*.md]
+trim_trailing_whitespace = false
+
+[{package.json,.travis.yml}]
+indent_style = space
+indent_size = 2

ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md → .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -1,20 +1,19 @@
-<!-- If you don't mind add a fun gif or meme, but no pressure -->
-![A GIF or MEME to give some spice of the internet](url)
-
-## *What* is wrong?
-<!-- Ex. run takes really long -->
-
-## *Where* does it happen?
-<!-- Ex. In GPU.js when trying to run a math function in node.js on my mac -->
-
-## *How* do we replicate the issue?
-<!-- Please be specific as possible. Use dashes (-) or numbers (1.) to create a list of steps -->
-
-## *How* important is this (1-5)?
-<!-- On a scale from 1-5 where 5 is the most important how would you rate it? -->
-
-## Expected behavior (i.e. solution)
-<!-- What do you think should have happened? -->
-
-
-## Other Comments
+<!-- If you don't mind add a fun gif or meme, but no pressure -->
+![A GIF or MEME to give some spice of the internet](url)
+
+## *What* is wrong?
+<!-- Ex. run takes really long -->
+
+## *Where* does it happen?
+<!-- Ex. In GPU.js when trying to run a math function in node.js on my mac -->
+
+## *How* do we replicate the issue?
+<!-- Please be specific as possible. Use dashes (-) or numbers (1.) to create a list of steps -->
+
+## *How* important is this (1-5)?
+<!-- On a scale from 1-5 where 5 is the most important how would you rate it? -->
+
+## Expected behavior (i.e. solution)
+<!-- What do you think should have happened? -->
+
+## Other Comments

.gitignore

@@ -1,36 +1,36 @@
-# Logs
-logs
-*.log
-npm-debug.log*
-
-# Runtime data
-pids
-*.pid
-*.seed
-
-# Directory for instrumented libs generated by jscoverage/JSCover
-lib-cov
-
-# Coverage directory used by tools like istanbul
-coverage
-
-# node-waf configuration
-.lock-wscript
-
-# Dependency directory
-node_modules
-
-# Optional npm cache directory
-.npm
-
-# Optional REPL history
-.node_repl_history
-
-# intellij
-.idea
-
-#yarn
-yarn.lock
-
-# OSX .DS_Store
-.DS_Store
+# Logs
+logs
+*.log
+npm-debug.log*
+
+# Runtime data
+pids
+*.pid
+*.seed
+
+# Directory for instrumented libs generated by jscoverage/JSCover
+lib-cov
+
+# Coverage directory used by tools like istanbul
+coverage
+
+# node-waf configuration
+.lock-wscript
+
+# Dependency directory
+node_modules
+
+# Optional npm cache directory
+.npm
+
+# Optional REPL history
+.node_repl_history
+
+# intellij
+.idea
+
+#yarn
+yarn.lock
+
+# OSX .DS_Store
+.DS_Store

build-tests.js

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/**
+ * Question: Why are we even using QUnit?
+ *
+ * We should be migrating to a more modern unit testing framework like Jest or Ava.
+ * I hear some people have even gotten WebGL-related testing done with Jest.
+ */
+
+const fs = require('fs');
+const path = require('path');
+const util = require('util');
+const { readDirDeep } = require('read-dir-deep');
+
+const readFile = util.promisify(fs.readFile)
+const unlink = util.promisify(fs.unlink)
+const writeFile = util.promisify(fs.writeFile)
+
+const CWD = process.cwd();
+
+async function main () {
+  const folder = 'test';
+  const output = path.resolve(CWD, folder, 'all.html');
+  const template = path.resolve(CWD, folder, 'all-template.html');
+  const rootPath = path.resolve(CWD, folder);
+  const warning = '<!-- the following list of javascript files is built automatically -->\n';
+
+  await unlink(output).catch(e => {});
+
+  const files = await readDirDeep(rootPath, {
+    patterns: [ '**/*.js' ],
+    ignore: [ '*.js' ]
+  });
+
+  const str = warning + files
+    .map(file => file.replace(/^test\//, ''))
+    .map(file => `<script type="module" src="${file}"></script>`)
+    .join('\n');
+
+  const file = await readFile(template, 'utf8');
+
+  const data = file.replace('{{test-files}}', str);
+
+  await writeFile(output, data);
+};
+
+main().catch(err => {
+  console.error(err.message)
+  process.exit(1)
+});