Setting royalties as per EIP2981 / ERC2981 #301
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
a small tweak to implement EIP2981 to set royalties.
I understand it is up to the marketplace to honour it (e.g. OpenSea and Rarible have their own "hack" for royalties) but it seems the EIP2981 is starting to be adopted by newer marketplaces and hopefully the dinosaurs will eventually follow.
these changes are small and hopefully make this contract future proof
as per Liarco suggestion, I've created a way to set royalties at any time, but have a default open in the construct
*note: I've only used this in a couple of test contracts, so please do your own tests and submit any feedback and/or tweaks here