-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add properties for quoting #275
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2db18db
feat: add properties for quoting
sabineschaller 4defa14
fix: formatting
sabineschaller daa0c4c
fix: types
sabineschaller 1222158
fix: op package with new types
sabineschaller dea5221
chore: add changeset
sabineschaller e6994b3
fix: tests
sabineschaller 66e4ae9
chore: remove fees, rename (max)sendAmount -> debit Amount
sabineschaller 299b556
fix: build
sabineschaller 22564ab
fix: amount description
sabineschaller 2d3e9d1
fix: generate types
sabineschaller 8b0f1fa
fix: remaining `sendAmount`s
sabineschaller 9b49453
chore: versioning
sabineschaller 2c77d1f
fix: generate types
sabineschaller 2d4c905
fix: server urls
sabineschaller e40d55a
fix: replace final sendAmount
sabineschaller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
'@interledger/open-payments': minor | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Adding properties for new quoting mechanism |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be major since it contains breaking changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I must have run the wrong command 🙃
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's technically still a major change, but it feels so minor...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should still be major since it's breaking, and I think we probably need to bump the
resource-server.yaml
andauth-server.yaml
version as well. Thats how we handled it when I renamed a field here: #270. Although the spec version bump was a minor bump 🤔... don't quite remember that reasoning.On the topic of it feeling minor, Max pointed to some relevant blog posts and hackernews discussion in this comment #270 (comment). I don't see any quick, easy wins there and think just doing a major bump still makes the most sense but it is interesting reading.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah +1 on making this a major since it is breaking.
The spec can stay minor IMO