-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: usage of potentially wrong melos version during script execution #783
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
To view this pull requests documentation preview, visit the following URL: Documentation is deployed and generated using docs.page. |
daa7230
to
c040977
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a quick glance it looks like a sound idea!
/// i.e. usually the globally activated version. If there is one. | ||
/// | ||
/// This can cause issues when melos is started with `dart run melos`, | ||
/// which will prefer the melos version specified via (dev_)dependencies. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Melos should always run scripts etc with the version that is defined in dev_dependencies
, even if it is started directly from the version on path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, thanks for the quick review.
Is this a future enhancement request or already implemented? 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The overarching goal of this PR is to eliminate ambiguity and surprises in the build process of Dart/Flutter applications. In line with that, I believe it would be ideal for Melos to behave in a consistent and predictable way.
Here’s what I think could be considered "unexpected" behavior:
- If Melos uses different versions of itself for script execution (i.e. for subprocesses of itself)
- This will be addressed with this PR!? :)
- If Melos silently switches to a different version at startup (i.e., in the main process)
- This could be especially challenging when intentionally testing a specific version.
- Perhaps an optional strict mode (e.g., for CI environments) could help, where Melos would verify that its version matches the one specified in
pubspec.lock
.- The version in
dev_dependencies
might only define a minimum version, which wouldn’t fully address this, as you likely know as well. :)
- The version in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a future enhancement request or already implemented? 🙂
It's already implemented, try pinning you melos version to an older version an see what happens. :)
The version in dev_dependencies might only define a minimum version, which wouldn’t fully address this, as you likely know as well. :)
If one wants a specific version of melos, why not just pin the version in pubspec? I don't see the need for any separate feature for this.
@spydon I'm unsure if this could/should/must be applied to other places as well, since this is the first time I had a look at the code. |
Description
See long comment at https://github.com/invertase/melos/pull/783/files#diff-35f09e1c67ac8d5bd4889489c6ce0f6dc320b1491828444f2eca21c0f8ff765cR343 :)
Type of Change
feat
-- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)fix
-- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)!
-- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)refactor
-- Code refactorci
-- Build configuration changedocs
-- Documentationchore
-- Chore