-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(fa): direct payments making code more readable #16657
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This reverts commit d9691c5.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16657 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.71% 36.71%
=======================================
Files 6858 6858
Lines 142638 142638
Branches 40639 40638 -1
=======================================
Hits 52365 52365
Misses 90273 90273
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 3 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 3 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-aid/financial-aid.service.ts (1)
152-164
: LGTM! Consider enhancing type safety.
The refactoring to use the spread operator improves code readability while maintaining functionality. The null checks with optional chaining are properly implemented.
Consider adding explicit type annotations for better type safety:
- const combinedTaxPayments = [
+ const combinedTaxPayments: DirectTaxPayment[] = [
...(externalDataSchema?.taxData?.data?.municipalitiesDirectTaxPayments
?.directTaxPayments || []),
...(externalDataSchema?.taxDataSpouse?.data
?.municipalitiesDirectTaxPayments?.directTaxPayments || []),
]
- return combinedTaxPayments.map((d) => {
+ return combinedTaxPayments.map((d: DirectTaxPayment) => {
d.userType = application.assignees.includes(auth.nationalId)
? UserType.SPOUSE
: UserType.APPLICANT
return d
})
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-aid/financial-aid.service.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-aid/financial-aid.service.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit