Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(haskolagatt): Remove obsolete program course enum #16690

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johannaagma
Copy link
Member

@johannaagma johannaagma commented Nov 1, 2024

What

Continued from #16604, forgot to remove enum

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated database migration to drop and recreate ENUM types for improved database management.

@johannaagma johannaagma requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2024 10:52
@johannaagma johannaagma added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a migration script for a PostgreSQL database that drops and recreates two ENUM types using Sequelize. The up method manages the dropping of the ENUM types enum_program_course_requirement and enum_program_course_semester_season, ensuring atomicity through transactions. The down method provides functionality to revert these changes by recreating the ENUM types with their specified values.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js Added up and down methods to handle dropping and recreating ENUM types in PostgreSQL.

Suggested reviewers

  • Rikkiabb
  • juni-haukur

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js (1)

18-40: Document enum values and rollback scenarios

The rollback implementation is correct, but consider adding documentation about:

  1. When a rollback might be necessary
  2. The meaning and usage of each enum value
  3. Why these enums are being removed (reference to PR fix(haskolagatt): Remove obsolete program course code #16604)

Add a comment block like this before the down method:

  /**
   * Rollback migration for program course enums.
   * These enums were originally used for [purpose] but were deprecated in PR #16604.
   * 
   * enum_program_course_requirement values:
   * - MANDATORY: Required courses that must be completed
   * - FREE_ELECTIVE: Any course that can be chosen freely
   * - RESTRICTED_ELECTIVE: Courses that must be chosen from a specific set
   * 
   * enum_program_course_semester_season values:
   * - FALL/SPRING/SUMMER: Specific semester offerings
   * - WHOLE_YEAR: Year-long courses
   * - ANY: Flexible scheduling
   */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0c9471 and f885360.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js (2)

Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
  • Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
  • Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🪛 Biome
apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js

[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.

The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.

(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js (1)

4-16: Verify no remaining references to the dropped enums

The migration implementation looks good with proper transaction handling. However, we should verify there are no remaining references to these enums in other tables.

Let's check for any remaining references:

✅ Verification successful

Migration appears safe to proceed

Based on the verification results:

  1. The enums are only referenced in their own drop migration file
  2. No other migrations or models are found using these enum types
  3. The migration includes a proper down method to recreate the enums if needed
  4. The changes are wrapped in a transaction for atomicity
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the enum types in other migration files
rg -i "enum_program_course_requirement|enum_program_course_semester_season" \
   --type sql \
   --type js \
   -g "migrations/*" \
   -g "models/*"

Length of output: 279


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct paths to migrations and models
fd -t f . -e js -e sql

# Then search for enum references in those files
rg -i "enum_program_course_requirement|enum_program_course_semester_season" 

Length of output: 54633


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any references to these enums in model files or other migrations
# First, find all model files
fd -t f -e js -e ts models

# Then check for any column definitions using these enum types
ast-grep --pattern 'type: DataTypes.ENUM'

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the migration file itself to understand if these enums were created in a previous migration
rg -B 10 -A 10 "enum_program_course" apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/20241101095509-drop-course-enum.js

# Also check for any other files in the university-gateway directory that might reference these enums
rg "enum_program_course" apps/services/university-gateway/

Length of output: 1936


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any previous migrations that might have created these enums
rg -l "CREATE TYPE.*enum_program_course" apps/services/university-gateway/migrations/

# And check for any model files in the university-gateway service
fd -t f . apps/services/university-gateway/ -e js -e ts | rg "models/"

Length of output: 237

Comment on lines +1 to +2
'use strict'

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove redundant 'use strict' directive

JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, making this directive unnecessary.

Apply this diff:

-'use strict'
-
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
'use strict'
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.

The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.

(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.64%. Comparing base (d0c9471) to head (f885360).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16690   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.64%   36.64%           
=======================================
  Files        6872     6872           
  Lines      143068   143068           
  Branches    40770    40770           
=======================================
  Hits        52431    52431           
  Misses      90637    90637           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.33% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.82% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 20.87% <ø> (ø)
services-university-gateway 49.35% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d0c9471...f885360. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs ca692c6 🔗

4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 11 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.4s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 120 2 3m 14.49s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 123 0 2m 4.54s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 31.17s 1 no change Link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants