-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specify parameter-based queries/methods in spec doc #266
Merged
otaviojava
merged 3 commits into
jakartaee:main
from
njr-11:255-define-parameter-based-methods-in-spec-doc
Sep 20, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we got this discussion somewhere before; annotations such as "Find" could get more flexibility in this case:
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/6.3/introduction/html_single/Hibernate_Introduction.html#generated-finder-methods
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found it: #223
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's certainly true that including annotations could add more flexibility here. However, that's a separate proposal, or separate aspect of a proposal, to consider and discuss separately and is not intended to be addressed by this pull. The scope of this pull is to specify what is described under your pull #260 where it states "determining the query from the supplied parameters and the
insert
,update
,delete
,find
,count
, orexists
prefix. Query by parameters constructs queries based on method parameters and prefixes."There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I remember this PR, and that is my point: Does it make sense to have insert and update methods?
Should we update to use "DataAcessObject" instead of Repository?
IMHO: we should remove the insert and update and abstract with "save" for a while.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I'm certainly not happy that I wasted all this effort documenting insert/update based on the fact that your pull added them so I thought you were in favor of them. But if you insist on removing them now, I'll update this pull to do so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@otaviojava I removed insert and update for you: a83a9d2