Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SAE Group for sweeps PR #17

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

SAE Group for sweeps PR #17

merged 17 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

Benw8888
Copy link
Contributor

I implemented the SAEGroup class, which is basically a list of autoencoders, and which automatically initializes autoencoders based on which parameters of the config are passed as lists. Then I modified the training code to handle using SAEGroups.

@jbloomAus
Copy link
Owner

@chanind I'm having trouble reproducing the isort check fail locally which is somewhat frustrating. Don't suppose you could take a look and fix it? Would prefer to turn off the isort check if this delays us merging this for more than a day.

@chanind
Copy link
Collaborator

chanind commented Feb 29, 2024

weird, I'm able to reproduce these errors locally. The commands I'm running are:

To display the error (same as what CI is running):

poetry run isort . --check-only --diff

To fix the errors:

poetry run isort .

What are these commands outputting when you run them?

Let me see if I can figure out how to make a PR to this fork's PR...

@chanind
Copy link
Collaborator

chanind commented Feb 29, 2024

I opened up a PR to @Benw8888's branch after running isort here: Benw8888#1. Merging this PR should fix the isort issue. I'm still confused why running isort isn't working for you both locally 🤔.

chore: running isort to fix imports
@jbloomAus
Copy link
Owner

Thanks @Benw8888 @chanind !

@jbloomAus jbloomAus merged commit 3e78bce into jbloomAus:main Feb 29, 2024
2 checks passed
tom-pollak pushed a commit to tom-pollak/SAELens that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants