Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operator/pkg/tasks/deinit: unit test kubeconfig #5676

Merged

Conversation

mohamedawnallah
Copy link
Contributor

Description

In this commit, we unit test kubeconfig deinit task in the operator package on cleaning up the secret if it has the given labels.

What type of PR is this?

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5491.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

In this commit, we unit test kubeconfig deinit task in the operator
package on cleaning up the secret if it has the given labels.

Signed-off-by: Mohamed Awnallah <[email protected]>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.71%. Comparing base (c16e52a) to head (cbeb308).
Report is 22 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5676      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   35.85%   36.71%   +0.86%     
==========================================
  Files         647      648       +1     
  Lines       45070    45079       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        16158    16551     +393     
+ Misses      27664    27281     -383     
+ Partials     1248     1247       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 36.71% <ø> (+0.86%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@XiShanYongYe-Chang XiShanYongYe-Chang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank~
/lgtm
/approve

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 14, 2024
@karmada-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@karmada-bot karmada-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 14, 2024
@karmada-bot karmada-bot merged commit 268e672 into karmada-io:master Oct 14, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants