Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor aws dynamodb streams scaler #6089

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dttung2905
Copy link
Contributor

Refactor aws dynamodb streams scaler.

Checklist

Relates to #5797

@dttung2905 dttung2905 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2024 20:17
Comment on lines +36 to +37
targetShardCount int64
activationTargetShardCount int64
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wozniakjan I'm leaving these out for now because the error logic handling is abit different in thise case. Instead of letting it failed on invalid input, this code just throws error and fallback to the default value

if val, ok := config.TriggerMetadata["shardCount"]; ok && val != "" {
shardCount, err := strconv.ParseInt(val, 10, 64)
if err != nil {
meta.targetShardCount = defaultTargetDBStreamsShardCount
logger.Error(err, "error parsing dyanmodb stream metadata shardCount, using default %n", defaultTargetDBStreamsShardCount)
} else {
meta.targetShardCount = shardCount
}
}
if val, ok := config.TriggerMetadata["activationShardCount"]; ok && val != "" {
shardCount, err := strconv.ParseInt(val, 10, 64)
if err != nil {
meta.activationTargetShardCount = defaultActivationTargetDBStreamsShardCount
logger.Error(err, "error parsing dyanmodb stream metadata activationTargetShardCount, using default %n", defaultActivationTargetDBStreamsShardCount)
} else {
meta.activationTargetShardCount = shardCount
}
}

Copy link
Member

@wozniakjan wozniakjan Oct 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for pointing this out, I'm ok with this. But if you and other @kedacore/keda-core-contributors are willing to make an exception with a breaking change here, I'd like to advocate for a throwing error here. Imho it leads to overall better UX after the initial surprise that something that used to work (incorrectly) no longer does.

Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 19, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale All issues that are marked as stale due to inactivity label Oct 19, 2024
@wozniakjan wozniakjan removed the stale All issues that are marked as stale due to inactivity label Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants