-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable landlock setlfetsts on tritium #1505
Conversation
706a5bc
to
c848c53
Compare
Can you rebase it please? |
c848c53
to
c15c87f
Compare
|
This is a relatively abundant and quick to boot board. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
c15c87f
to
3d9010c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That'll need some progress on the kselftest-slim PR #1759 |
I've added some comments on #1759 about only increasing the number of builds for mainline and next rather than all the build configs. |
Adding skip label because of #1994 |
Any news? Could you please enable Landlock tests now? |
@nuclearcat @broonie ^ Could you please take a look? |
We put most efforts now on enabling tests on new system. Legacy system tests coverage is already being reduced and lab owners are discussing about switching to new, and then after short validation period switching off legacy system support. |
FYI: kernelci/kernelci-project#337 As soon as we enable the stable-rcs reports in the new infra, Collabora will be also looking at cutting their lab out of the legacy system. |
Closing, as we are deprecating the legacy system. If this is still an issue or relevant, please re-open it under the Maestro system. Thank you for your contribution, and sorry for the inconvenience. |
How to re-open this issue under the Maestro system? |
You can open issue in https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-pipeline/ |
During cleanup in legacy system, author of PR kernelci/kernelci-core#1505 expressed interest in enabling landlock tests. Let's do first step and enable landlock tests at least on x86 devices. Signed-off-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <[email protected]>
During cleanup in legacy system, author of PR kernelci/kernelci-core#1505 expressed interest in enabling landlock tests. Let's do first step and enable landlock tests at least on x86 devices. Signed-off-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <[email protected]>
During cleanup in legacy system, author of PR kernelci/kernelci-core#1505 expressed interest in enabling landlock tests. Let's do first step and enable landlock tests at least on x86 devices. Signed-off-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <[email protected]>
Here is one of landlock tests, as i noticed many of them failing, is there any reasons of that? Kernel config is mostly x86_64_defconfig with some hardware options enabled. |
Landlock needs to be enabled in the kernel. The only non-default config to set should be All the required kernel options are listed (and kept up-to-date) in |
It was working on x86 sona: #1524 |
Yes, I think we will need to add a separate option to enable selected kselftest config options. Based on prior experience, we must be careful, as I recall some networking kselftests configs breaking network boot in labs. However, landlock and a few others should be safe. I also remember some options increasing the kernel size to a level that prevents booting on certain boards. |
Enable landlock selftests on Tritum