Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove extra interfaces #151

Merged

Conversation

Amuhar
Copy link
Contributor

@Amuhar Amuhar commented Sep 7, 2023

No description provided.

@Amuhar Amuhar requested a review from infloop September 7, 2023 20:39
@Amuhar Amuhar requested a review from eddort September 8, 2023 08:10
@Amuhar Amuhar requested a review from avsetsin September 18, 2023 13:00
import { RegistryKey } from '../../../common/registry';

// TODO: it enough use key from registry , lets remove
export class CuratedKey extends Key {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remains the mention of CuratedKey in the readme

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It fixed in readme pr

import { RegistryOperator } from '../../../common/registry';

// TODO: it enough use operator from registry , lets remove
export class CuratedOperator extends Operator {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remains the mention of CuratedOperator in the readme

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It fixed in readme pr

Comment on lines 34 to 35
@ApiProperty({ description: 'The maximum number of validators to stake for this operator' })
stakingLimit: number;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say that this is the number of keys vetted by the DAO and that can be used for the deposit. So that there is no confusion with the target limit

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will fix here #158

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
export * from './response';
export * from './key-with-module-address';
// export * from './key-with-module-address';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can be deleted

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will fix here #158

@Amuhar Amuhar merged commit 7c69128 into feat/VAL-189-sr-modules-support Sep 20, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants