Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #944

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #944

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

MrEgorLite
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@yulia-pl yulia-pl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥🔥🔥

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your hard work on this project! 🎉 While your code is well-structured and follows many best practices, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve the pull request. Specifically, the use of User instead of get_user_model() can impact the flexibility and maintainability of your code. Additionally, the redundant user.save() call and the missing migrations are important to fix to ensure the functionality and integrity of the application. Once these issues are resolved, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the great work, and I'm confident you'll nail it with the next iteration. 😊

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

Comment on lines +19 to +44
migrations.CreateModel(
name='User',
fields=[
('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
('password', models.CharField(max_length=128, verbose_name='password')),
('last_login', models.DateTimeField(blank=True, null=True, verbose_name='last login')),
('is_superuser', models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Designates that this user has all permissions without explicitly assigning them.', verbose_name='superuser status')),
('username', models.CharField(error_messages={'unique': 'A user with that username already exists.'}, help_text='Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.', max_length=150, unique=True, validators=[django.contrib.auth.validators.UnicodeUsernameValidator()], verbose_name='username')),
('first_name', models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=150, verbose_name='first name')),
('last_name', models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=150, verbose_name='last name')),
('email', models.EmailField(blank=True, max_length=254, verbose_name='email address')),
('is_staff', models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Designates whether the user can log into this admin site.', verbose_name='staff status')),
('is_active', models.BooleanField(default=True, help_text='Designates whether this user should be treated as active. Unselect this instead of deleting accounts.', verbose_name='active')),
('date_joined', models.DateTimeField(default=django.utils.timezone.now, verbose_name='date joined')),
('groups', models.ManyToManyField(blank=True, help_text='The groups this user belongs to. A user will get all permissions granted to each of their groups.', related_name='user_set', related_query_name='user', to='auth.Group', verbose_name='groups')),
('user_permissions', models.ManyToManyField(blank=True, help_text='Specific permissions for this user.', related_name='user_set', related_query_name='user', to='auth.Permission', verbose_name='user permissions')),
],
options={
'verbose_name': 'user',
'verbose_name_plural': 'users',
'abstract': False,
},
managers=[
('objects', django.contrib.auth.models.UserManager()),
],
),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The User model is being created here. If this is intended to replace the default Django user model, ensure that AUTH_USER_MODEL is set correctly in your settings. This is crucial for maintaining consistency across your application.

Comment on lines +91 to +93
migrations.AddConstraint(
model_name='ticket',
constraint=models.UniqueConstraint(fields=('row', 'seat', 'movie_session'), name='unique_movie_session'),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The UniqueConstraint on the Ticket model ensures that each combination of row, seat, and movie_session is unique. This is a good practice to prevent duplicate tickets for the same seat in a session.

services/user.py Outdated
Comment on lines 40 to 44
user = None
try:
user = User.objects.get(id=user_id)
except User.DoesNotExist:
print(f"User with user_id {user_id} does not exist")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The try-except block for User.DoesNotExist is redundant here since the outer try-except block already handles this exception. Consider removing the inner try-except block and directly handling the exception in the outer block.

services/user.py Outdated
Comment on lines 24 to 28
def get_user(user_id: int) -> User | None:
try:
return User.objects.get(id=user_id)
except User.DoesNotExist:
print(f"User with user_id {user_id} does not exist")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of printing an error message when a user does not exist, consider using logging or returning None to handle this case more gracefully.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job on your submission! 🎉 Your code demonstrates a solid understanding of Django's best practices, especially in areas like using transaction.atomic for atomic operations and extending AbstractUser for the custom User model. However, there are a few critical issues that need attention:

  1. Custom User Model in Migrations: It's crucial to define your custom User model in models.py and set it as AUTH_USER_MODEL in settings.py rather than creating it directly in migrations. This ensures better integration with Django's authentication system.

  2. Use of get_user_model(): In services/user.py, replace User.objects.create_user() and User.objects.get() with get_user_model() to enhance flexibility and maintainability.

  3. Redundant user.save() Call: The create_user function contains an unnecessary user.save() call after User.objects.create_user(), which should be removed.

  4. Security Concern with SECRET_KEY: Avoid hardcoding the SECRET_KEY in settings.py for production. Use environment variables or a separate configuration file to manage sensitive information securely.

These adjustments will help you improve your code quality and adhere to best practices. Remember, addressing these issues will not only enhance your current project but also strengthen your skills for future endeavors. Keep up the great work, and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Comment on lines +19 to +44
migrations.CreateModel(
name='User',
fields=[
('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
('password', models.CharField(max_length=128, verbose_name='password')),
('last_login', models.DateTimeField(blank=True, null=True, verbose_name='last login')),
('is_superuser', models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Designates that this user has all permissions without explicitly assigning them.', verbose_name='superuser status')),
('username', models.CharField(error_messages={'unique': 'A user with that username already exists.'}, help_text='Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.', max_length=150, unique=True, validators=[django.contrib.auth.validators.UnicodeUsernameValidator()], verbose_name='username')),
('first_name', models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=150, verbose_name='first name')),
('last_name', models.CharField(blank=True, max_length=150, verbose_name='last name')),
('email', models.EmailField(blank=True, max_length=254, verbose_name='email address')),
('is_staff', models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Designates whether the user can log into this admin site.', verbose_name='staff status')),
('is_active', models.BooleanField(default=True, help_text='Designates whether this user should be treated as active. Unselect this instead of deleting accounts.', verbose_name='active')),
('date_joined', models.DateTimeField(default=django.utils.timezone.now, verbose_name='date joined')),
('groups', models.ManyToManyField(blank=True, help_text='The groups this user belongs to. A user will get all permissions granted to each of their groups.', related_name='user_set', related_query_name='user', to='auth.Group', verbose_name='groups')),
('user_permissions', models.ManyToManyField(blank=True, help_text='Specific permissions for this user.', related_name='user_set', related_query_name='user', to='auth.Permission', verbose_name='user permissions')),
],
options={
'verbose_name': 'user',
'verbose_name_plural': 'users',
'abstract': False,
},
managers=[
('objects', django.contrib.auth.models.UserManager()),
],
),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The creation of a User model directly in the migration is not recommended. Instead, you should define your custom user model in the models.py file and set it as the AUTH_USER_MODEL in your settings. This approach ensures that your user model is properly integrated with Django's authentication system.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants