Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solution #952

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VolodymyrSemchysyn
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@94nj111 94nj111 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job!

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Thank you for your hard work on this pull request! 😊 While your code is generally well-structured and follows good practices, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it:

  1. Order Model's created_at Field: The Order model should have the created_at field set with auto_now_add=True to automatically fill this field during creation. Currently, it uses default=datetime.now, which does not meet the requirement.

  2. Use of transaction.atomic: Ensure that the create_movie function in services/movie.py uses transaction.atomic to maintain atomicity, as specified in the task description.

These issues are important as they impact the functionality and requirements of the task. Once these are resolved, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further assistance. 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.


operations = [
migrations.CreateModel(
name='User',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Creating a custom User model can be useful for extending user functionality, but ensure that this is necessary and that the AUTH_USER_MODEL setting in your Django settings is updated to point to this model.

name='Order',
fields=[
('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Order model uses settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL for the user ForeignKey, which is correct. Ensure that AUTH_USER_MODEL is set correctly in your Django settings if you are using a custom user model.

db/models.py Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
from django.contrib.auth.models import AbstractUser, User

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The import of User from django.contrib.auth.models is unnecessary since you are defining a custom User model inheriting from AbstractUser. Consider removing this import to avoid confusion.


class Order(models.Model):
created_at = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.now)
user = models.ForeignKey(settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Order model uses settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL for the user ForeignKey, which is correct. Ensure that AUTH_USER_MODEL is set correctly in your Django settings if you are using a custom user model.

from django.db.models import QuerySet

from db.models import Movie


def get_movies(
genres_ids: list[int] = None,
actors_ids: list[int] = None,
genres_ids: list[int] = None,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type hint list[int] is only supported in Python 3.9 and later. If you need compatibility with earlier Python versions, consider using List[int] from the typing module.

actors_ids: list = None,
movie_title: str,
movie_description: str,
genres_ids: list = None,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type hint list for genres_ids and actors_ids is not specific. Consider using Optional[List[int]] for better clarity and compatibility with Python versions earlier than 3.9.

@@ -42,3 +42,14 @@ def update_movie_session(

def delete_movie_session_by_id(session_id: int) -> None:
MovieSession.objects.get(id=session_id).delete()


def get_taken_seats(movie_session_id: int) -> list[dict[str, int]]:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type hint list[dict[str, int]] is only supported in Python 3.9 and later. If you need compatibility with earlier Python versions, consider using List[Dict[str, int]] from the typing module.

from db.models import Order, Ticket


def create_order(tickets: list[dict],

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type hint list[dict] is only supported in Python 3.9 and later. If you need compatibility with earlier Python versions, consider using List[Dict] from the typing module.

return order


def get_orders(username: Optional[str] = None) -> list[Order]:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The type hint list[Order] is only supported in Python 3.9 and later. If you need compatibility with earlier Python versions, consider using List[Order] from the typing module.

Comment on lines +48 to +49
if username:
user.username = username

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When updating the username, ensure that the new username is unique to prevent integrity errors. Consider adding validation to handle this scenario.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job on addressing the previous issues and improving the code! 🎉 The Pull Request is approved to help you move forward with your learning journey. Here are some key points and suggestions for further improvement:

  1. Order Model's created_at Field: You've correctly used auto_now_add=True for the created_at field, ensuring it is automatically filled during creation. However, be cautious with manually setting this field, as it can lead to inconsistencies. Consider removing this logic unless there's a specific need for custom dates.

  2. Import Statement for Settings: In the models file, the import statement should be corrected to from django.conf import settings to properly access the settings module in Django.

  3. Use of transaction.atomic: Excellent use of @transaction.atomic in the create_movie function to ensure atomicity, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.

  4. General Code Structure: Overall, the code is well-structured and follows Django's best practices. The use of validation methods and exception handling is commendable.

Remember, addressing these minor issues will enhance the robustness and maintainability of your code. Keep up the good work and continue learning from each iteration! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

from django.db import models

import settings

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The import statement import settings is incorrect. In Django, you should import settings using from django.conf import settings to access the settings module.

Comment on lines +13 to +15
if date:
order.created_at = date
order.save()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually setting the created_at field can lead to inconsistencies, as it overrides the automatic timestamping provided by auto_now_add=True. Consider removing this logic unless there's a specific requirement to allow custom dates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants