Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[material-ui][docs] Add Hatchify to the admin frameworks section #41647

Closed

Conversation

aminnoah
Copy link

@aminnoah aminnoah commented Mar 25, 2024

Check out the repo and start building - https://github.com/bitovi/hatchify

Watch the getting started video - https://youtu.be/4xD9DQ_V-x4

Read the launch article - https://www.bitovi.com/blog/introducing-hatchify-low-code-libraries-for-react-node-and-sequelize

@aminnoah aminnoah changed the title Added Hatchify to Admin frameworks section [docs]Added Hatchify to Admin frameworks section Mar 25, 2024
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Mar 25, 2024

@danilo-leal danilo-leal changed the title [docs]Added Hatchify to Admin frameworks section [material0ui][docs] Add Hatchify to the admin frameworks section Mar 25, 2024
@danilo-leal danilo-leal added docs Improvements or additions to the documentation package: material-ui Specific to @mui/material labels Mar 25, 2024
@danilo-leal danilo-leal changed the title [material0ui][docs] Add Hatchify to the admin frameworks section [material-ui][docs] Add Hatchify to the admin frameworks section Mar 25, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added PR: out-of-date The pull request has merge conflicts and can't be merged labels Mar 26, 2024
@danilo-leal
Copy link
Contributor

@samuelsycamore seems good to me! Any thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to the documentation package: material-ui Specific to @mui/material PR: out-of-date The pull request has merge conflicts and can't be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants