Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt to deprecations in pandas 2.2.0 #3620

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mwaskom
Copy link
Owner

@mwaskom mwaskom commented Jan 21, 2024

😠

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (a3cb0f1) 98.58% compared to head (a38dfd6) 98.58%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3620   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.58%   98.58%           
=======================================
  Files          75       75           
  Lines       24697    24706    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits        24348    24357    +9     
  Misses        349      349           
Files Coverage Δ
seaborn/_base.py 97.90% <100.00%> (ø)
seaborn/_compat.py 60.52% <100.00%> (+2.77%) ⬆️
seaborn/_core/plot.py 99.15% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
seaborn/categorical.py 98.92% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
seaborn/relational.py 99.65% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
tests/_stats/test_density.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
tests/test_categorical.py 99.26% <100.00%> (ø)

@mwaskom mwaskom merged commit 7aed2a0 into master Jan 21, 2024
13 checks passed
@mwaskom mwaskom deleted the maint/pandas-2.2.0-compat branch January 21, 2024 01:46
@@ -2078,7 +2078,7 @@ def test_xy_native_scale_log_transform(self):

def test_datetime_native_scale_axis(self):

x = pd.date_range("2010-01-01", periods=20, freq="m")
x = pd.date_range("2010-01-01", periods=20, freq="MS")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW if you want to have the same values as before you need "ME" (month end, not month start). Not sure whether that matters for the test, though (you test below with "2003-02-28", which is a "month end")

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yeah thanks, the test date here being a "month end" is just a coincidence and not critical to the test logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants