Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove unnecessary/unsafe permissions to gen_ai_review #595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

dbarrosop
Copy link
Member

@dbarrosop dbarrosop commented Dec 9, 2024

PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Removed the 'contents: write' permission from the GitHub Actions workflow file to enhance security by limiting permissions to only what is necessary.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
gen_ai_review.yaml
Remove unnecessary permissions from GitHub workflow           

.github/workflows/gen_ai_review.yaml

  • Removed unnecessary 'contents: write' permission from the workflow
    file.
  • +0/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link
    Contributor

    github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No major issues detected

    Copy link
    Contributor

    github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    @dbarrosop dbarrosop changed the title chore: remove unnecessary/unneeded permissions chore: remove unnecessary/unsafe permissions to gen_ai_review Dec 9, 2024
    @dbarrosop dbarrosop merged commit bfb7cab into main Dec 9, 2024
    6 of 7 checks passed
    @dbarrosop dbarrosop deleted the ai-perms branch December 9, 2024 13:14
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants