-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stateless API #258
Closed
Closed
Stateless API #258
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5d20b43
Test suite fixes
fjarri 76e95c9
Remove mutation in set_correctness_keys() and create a new object ins…
fjarri 42f1b9d
Get rid of `attach_cfrag()` and pass cfrags to `decrypt_reencrypted()…
fjarri ca86304
Attach a proof to a cfrag on creation unconditionally
fjarri 3e95809
Remove code duplication from `decrypt*` functions
fjarri 6696ebb
Verify Capsules once on creation
fjarri File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reads like a layer of indirection to me. We had a "capsule", but if we add something to it, we get not the same "capsule", but a different "capsule"? Of a different class?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See above about having a
VerifyingMetadata
(or something along these lines) instead that would wrap these three keys. What do you think about this approach?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And then compose that on this capsule?
I'm interested to hear about the why in addition to the what. Why is this change (and the rest of the capsule fissure) helpful in your mind?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because the verifying metadata is secondary to the capsule. A capsule can be used without it. You can keep it as a separate object, or as a part of another object combining both the capsule and the keys, that's details. The change I'm introducing here is to remove the mutability. I do not understand why you are calling it a fissure.