Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Editorial 2024 02 28 #691

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 17, 2024
Merged

Editorial 2024 02 28 #691

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 17, 2024

Conversation

tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor

@tschmidtb51
References
ea1d449 
- fixes oasis-tcs#684
- add RFC 8322 as informative reference
@tschmidtb51
BOM Link
1612c75 
- fixes oasis-tcs#687
- correct namespace
@tschmidtb51
Editorial
9429813 
- update date
- update revision history
- update citation format
@tschmidtb51
Size limit
7aa5c24 
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#626
- update size limit and unit
@tschmidtb51
Artifacts
ae30854 
- generate artifacts for easier reading
@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 added the csaf 2.1 csaf 2.1 work label Feb 16, 2024
@tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sthagen: It looks like, the end of the HTML file is missing. Could be the script or my computer 🙈

sthagen
sthagen approved these changes Feb 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sthagen sthagen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this draft is ready for review by the TC.
Great work, @tschmidtb51! Thanks a lot.

@sthagen sthagen self-assigned this Feb 17, 2024
@sthagen sthagen merged commit 469fba2 into oasis-tcs:editor-revision-2024-02-28 Feb 17, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sthagen sthagen sthagen approved these changes

Assignees

@sthagen sthagen

Labels
csaf 2.1 csaf 2.1 work
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tschmidtb51 @sthagen