Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hotfix/stability #10
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Hotfix/stability #10
Changes from 2 commits
e0dab5a
29e0f00
afadc94
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not call it explicitly like this in every
json.loads
call ?? or use thisrelaxed_json_loads
.Even though the approach is very nice in shape. I think it obscures what's really happening, and that's important for maintenance and readability of the code.
From my point of view, I'd say, let's make the call explicit as it is in this line, or use the function
relaxed_json_loads
, so we know something different is happeningWhat do you think about this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea it's not my preferred solution at all, however the issue actual originates inside the wandb codebase - they enforce strict mode when pulling assets from their databases. We never actually call json decide ourselves..
I propose we put it either here or shamefully in a Util file for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So it's a way of overriding json globally.
Floppy actually came up with this hack because anyone who wants to analyze wandb data has to do something similar