Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

_targets: rename sparcv8leon3 to sparcv8leon #229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

_targets: rename sparcv8leon3 to sparcv8leon #229

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

lukileczo
Copy link
Member

@lukileczo lukileczo commented Nov 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

JIRA: RTOS-883

Description

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (refactoring, style fixes, git/CI config, submodule management, no code logic changes)

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Already covered by automatic testing.
  • New test added: (add PR link here).
  • Tested by hand on: (list targets here).

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing linter checks and tests passed.
  • My changes generate no new compilation warnings for any of the targets.

Special treatment

This was referenced Nov 5, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
@agkaminski agkaminski merged commit d96ff34 into master Nov 5, 2024
22 of 27 checks passed
@agkaminski agkaminski deleted the lukileczo/sparc-rename branch November 5, 2024 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@agkaminski agkaminski agkaminski approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@lukileczo @agkaminski