Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump archiver version #5930

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yaron12n
Copy link

@yaron12n yaron12n commented Dec 19, 2024

Bump version for archiver

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced dependency management with updated versions for improved functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Retraction of a problematic dependency version to address compatibility issues.
  • Documentation

    • Updated import paths to reflect the latest version of the archiver library.

@auto-assign auto-assign bot requested a review from dwisiswant0 December 19, 2024 17:52
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

level=error msg="Running error: context loading failed: failed to load packages: failed to load packages: failed to load with go/packages: err: exit status 1: stderr: go: errors parsing go.mod:\ngo.mod:80:2: require github.com/mholt/archiver: version "v3.5.1" invalid: should be v0 or v1, not v3\n"

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on updating dependencies in the project's go.mod file and modifying the import path for the archiver library. The changes involve upgrading the github.com/mholt/archiver dependency to version 3, adding new dependencies like xpath and chroma, and updating the import statement in the request.go file to use the new library version. These modifications aim to improve dependency management and ensure compatibility with the latest library versions.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod - Updated github.com/mholt/archiver to v3.5.1
- Added github.com/antchfx/xpath v1.2.4
- Added github.com/alecthomas/chroma v0.10.0
- Retracted version v3.2.0
pkg/protocols/file/request.go - Updated import path from github.com/mholt/archiver to github.com/mholt/archiver/v3

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Dependency Dance 🎉

Hop, hop, through the mod file we go,
Updating versions, watching them grow,
Archiver leaps to version three,
New packages join our library spree!

Code hops forward, dependencies bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 358249b and b7edad3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • pkg/protocols/file/request.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pkg/protocols/file/request.go (1)

12-12: LGTM! Import path correctly updated for v3

The import path change from github.com/mholt/archiver to github.com/mholt/archiver/v3 aligns with Go module versioning best practices.

Let's verify that all archiver imports are updated consistently:

✅ Verification successful

Import path correctly updated and consistently used

The verification confirms that:

  1. The archiver v3 import is the only instance of the archiver import in the codebase
  2. The code correctly uses archiver interfaces (Walker and Decompressor) from v3
  3. No old imports of archiver remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old archiver imports
rg "github.com/mholt/archiver\"$" --type go

Length of output: 44


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any archiver imports (both v3 and non-v3) to get a complete picture
rg "github.com/mholt/archiver" --type go

Length of output: 102


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check where archiver types/interfaces are actually used
ast-grep --pattern 'archiver.$_'

Length of output: 267


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the content of the file to understand the usage
cat pkg/protocols/file/request.go

Length of output: 13157

go.mod (1)

80-80: Verify compatibility with archiver v3.5.1

The version bump from v3.1.1+incompatible to v3.5.1 removes the +incompatible suffix, indicating proper Go module support. Let's verify there are no breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

Version update appears safe to proceed

The codebase uses only basic interfaces from the archiver package (Walker, Decompressor, and File), which are stable core features. The usage is straightforward:

  • Type assertions for Walker and Decompressor
  • Basic operations: Walk() method and File.Name()
  • No usage of advanced or potentially changed features

These fundamental interfaces have remained stable across v3.x versions, and the removal of +incompatible suffix indicates better Go module compatibility.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check archiver's changelog and release notes for breaking changes
gh api repos/mholt/archiver/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name=="v3.5.1") | .body'

# Check if the interfaces used in the code (Walker, Decompressor) have changed
rg -A 2 "archiver\.(Walker|Decompressor)" --type go

Length of output: 646


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of archiver in the codebase to understand the interfaces better
ast-grep --pattern 'archiver.$_'

# Also check for any direct imports of archiver
rg '^import.*archiver' --type go -A 1

# Let's see the actual implementation where archiver is used
rg -B 2 -A 5 'archiver\.(Walker|Decompressor)' --type go

Length of output: 1464


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@GeorginaReeder
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution @yaron12n !

Copy link
Member

@ehsandeep ehsandeep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lint error

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants