Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change in the assignment of
value
using a nestedget
method call is intended to fix the bug related to handling integer values inextra_data
. However, there's a potential issue with the current implementation:This line attempts to address the bug by using a fallback mechanism for retrieving data. However, the use of
details.get(name, details.get(alias))
as the default value in the firstget
call might not be entirely correct. This approach assumes thatdetails
will always have thename
oralias
keys, which might not be the case, potentially leading toNone
being assigned tovalue
even whenresponse
has a relevant entry.A more robust solution would be to explicitly check for the presence of keys in
response
anddetails
and then decide the value ofvalue
. This could involve a conditional check or a more nuanced approach to ensure that integer values like0
are correctly handled and not overridden byNone
or missed due to the fallback logic not being triggered as expected.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, in the end
value
can beNone
, its ok and handled in one line below.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@igorgaming: Thank you for your patience. After reviewing the lines immediately following the modification, it's clear that the code does indeed handle cases where
value
might beNone
. The conditional check:ensures that if
discard
isTrue
andvalue
isNone
(or evaluates toFalse
, which includes0
,False
,[]
, etc.), the loop will continue without assigningNone
todata[alias]
. This mechanism effectively addresses the concern aboutNone
values being incorrectly processed, aligning with your explanation. It seems the implementation is designed to accommodateNone
values appropriately, confirming the robustness of the bug fix. Thank you for clarifying this aspect of the code change.Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 697