Bump Codecov action to v5

[webknjaz]

It's more stable and requires a token that is already in the config.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.55201%. Comparing base (3260974) to head (1290249).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (3260974) and HEAD (1290249). Click for more details.

HEAD has 116 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (3260974)	HEAD (1290249)
3.11	14	5
Cython	8	4
3.9	25	9
3.13	14	5
Ubuntu	21	7
macOS	18	6
3.12	15	5
3.10	12	4
Alpine	3	1
pypy-3.10	9	3
Windows	39	13

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##                 main       #3161          +/-   ##
=====================================================
- Coverage   100.00000%   55.55201%   -44.44799%     
=====================================================
  Files             124         246         +122     
  Lines           18427       37608       +19181     
  Branches         1215        2725        +1510     
=====================================================
+ Hits            18427       20892        +2465     
- Misses              0       16393       +16393     
- Partials            0         323         +323     

see 238 files with indirect coverage changes

[jakkdl]

so yeah, uh, not much to review other than this 🙃

#2951 should have some prior research

[webknjaz]

Yeah, that also surprised me. It does need research… One should probably start by comparing the payloads between the PR and main..

[graingert]

@webknjaz I think you've not enabled edits from maintainers, so I can't update this branch from the base branch for you

[webknjaz]

Yeah, I often disable that.

[webknjaz]

Anyway, with the huge reported coverage drop and the flakiness I was observing in Ansible, I'd like to investigate what's broken in Codecov first.