Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove apparently-unused import torchvision in model.py #1305

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/torchchat/1305

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit ce3c32c with merge base 791fe82 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. label Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@vmpuri vmpuri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mikekgfb
Copy link
Contributor

Should this also include removing torchvision from install/install_requirements.sh ?

@swolchok swolchok merged commit 95ebcb8 into main Oct 17, 2024
52 checks passed
mikekgfb added a commit to mikekgfb/torchchat-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
After pytorch#1305 removed dependence on torchvision, this PR drops torchvision installation as part of install_requirements.sh
mreso pushed a commit to mreso/torchchat that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants