Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep NMS index gathering on cuda device #8766

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ghelfi
Copy link

@Ghelfi Ghelfi commented Nov 29, 2024

Performs the unwrap of IoU mask directly on the cuda device in NMS.

This prevents device -> host -> device data transfer.

fixes #8713

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 29, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8766

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Hi @Ghelfi!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@Ghelfi Ghelfi force-pushed the nms-unwrap-on-cuda branch from 2db6ab2 to 3f40bdb Compare December 20, 2024 12:29
@Ghelfi Ghelfi marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 13:54
@Ghelfi
Copy link
Author

Ghelfi commented Dec 20, 2024

@NicolasHug for review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

torchvision.ops.boxes.batched_nms slow on large box numbers
2 participants