Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

start adding documentation on updating mapping #5290

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

trinity-1686a
Copy link
Contributor

Description

add documentation on the known limitations when updating a doc mapping

@rdettai i know you were surprised by a few things, please step in if you think I missed anything important
@fmassot you might have opinions on things to add too.

this is based on the expect stat of updates once all currently existing PR on the subject are merged

@trinity-1686a trinity-1686a added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2024

On SSD:

Average search latency is 1.01x that of the reference (lower is better).
Ref run id: 3629, ref commit: 450f26a
Link

On GCS:

Average search latency is 0.986x that of the reference (lower is better).
Ref run id: 3630, ref commit: 450f26a
Link

docs/reference/updating-mapper.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/reference/updating-mapper.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/reference/updating-mapper.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/reference/updating-mapper.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/reference/updating-mapper.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/reference/updating-mapper.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@trinity-1686a trinity-1686a force-pushed the trinity/update-mapper-doc branch from 36528e1 to 02f2edb Compare September 27, 2024 10:46
Comment on lines +643 to +647
TantivyValue::F64(number) => match number {
0.0 => Some(false),
1.0 => Some(true),
_ => None,
},
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i realized while writing the doc that missing this conversion was odd given u64/i64 had it, and bool->f64 was a thing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants