Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improves all chapters #75

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Improves all chapters #75

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

lftan
Copy link
Collaborator

@lftan lftan commented Oct 18, 2024

Fixes grammars and rephrased some sentences for concisens.

@lftan lftan force-pushed the improve branch 3 times, most recently from 146b202 to fe977c0 Compare October 18, 2024 05:21
src/intro.adoc Outdated
@@ -40,24 +40,24 @@ microcontroller. An RPMI transport instance is associated to a particular
RISC-V privilege level of the application processors and it must be accessed
only by that RISC-V privilege level.

*RPMI Messaging Protocol*: The RPMI messaging protocol includes different
types of RPMI messages and the format each RPMI message type.
*RPMI Messaging Protocol*: The RPMI messaging protocol defined different
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

defines

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ encoding for the power state.

[#device-power-notifications]
==== Notifications
This service group does not support any event for notification.
This service group does not support event notifications.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is giving the incorrect meaning

This section in all the service groups defines EVENTs which are available for notification or for notification message. If NO event is defined then "no event for notification"

The changed line "does not support event notifications" is talking more about the functionality - the Event Notifications functionality is not supported.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment applied to all the service groups

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, will update this


==== Service: SYSSUSP_ENABLE_NOTIFICATION (SERVICE_ID: 0x01)
This service allows the application processor to subscribe to `SYSTEM_SUSPEND`
service group defined events for notification. The platform can optionally
This service allows the application processor to subscribe to events defined by
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This format must then be used in all service groups *_ENABLE_NOTIFICATION service

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see only few service groups are changed. I also dont think the earlier line had issues.
Either one, Old or new, must be same for every service group

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

standardized to all sections.

Fixes grammars and rephrased some sentences for concisens.

Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
@pathakraul pathakraul merged commit d6ba4b8 into riscv-non-isa:main Oct 18, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants