Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2024-06-06 Review Feedback #1
2024-06-06 Review Feedback #1
Changes from 1 commit
58e6f4c
4012965
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I am not sure I understand from the spec. Could you elaborate what exactly is the ACPI device here? What type of device is it and is there an example _HID? And what about PCI devices or which have standard enumeration methods?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can add a PCI device resource ID type and call out BDF as the identifier to use. Is that acceptable?
As for an ACPI device, if a resource that is managed by a controller is described as an ACPI device, then the Resource ID will capture the ACPI _HID and _UID of such a device.
One potential use case might be if say an ATC is described by an ACPI device (which we don't have any specification today), then we could describe the ATC resource using the ACPI _HID/_UID info.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, what will be the Resource Type for IOATC? If it is not Cache, then shouldn't there be new Resource Type itself be defined?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We will need to define a new Resource ID Type and not a new Resource Type.. Resource Type is still Cache for an IOATC, but, the representation of that may or may not go into a PPTT table. We don't know that yet as we haven't defined an IOATC representation yet. Having a Resource ID Type field allows us the flexibility to identify a Cache resource as either a PPTT Cache ID or any other way we may need to represent in future. Makes sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh OK. Thanks!