Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #96816

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
May 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

GuillaumeGomez and others added 23 commits May 2, 2022 15:06
Port the "unconstrained opaque type" diagnostic to using the diagnostic
derive.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Diagnostics can have multiple primary spans, or have subdiagnostics
repeated at multiple locations, so support `Vec<..>` fields in the
diagnostic derive which become loops in the generated code.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Currently, the only API for creating errors from a diagnostic derive
will emit it immediately. This makes it difficult to add subdiagnostics
to diagnostics from the derive, so add `create_{err,warning}` functions
that return the diagnostic without emitting it.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
Port the "explicit generic arguments with impl trait" diagnostic to
using the diagnostic derive.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <[email protected]>
make Size and Align debug-printing a bit more compact

In particular in `{:#?}`-mode, these take up a lot of space, so I think this is the better alternative (even though it is a bit longer in `{:?}` mode, I think it is still more readable).

We could make it even smaller by deviating further from what the actual code looks like, e.g. via something like `Size(4 bytes)`. Not sure what people would think about that?

Cc `````@oli-obk`````
…ession, r=notriddle

Fix jump to def regression

rust-lang#93803 introduced a regression in the "jump to def" feature. This fixes it.

Nice side-effect: it adds a new regression test. :)

I also used this opportunity to add documentation about this unstable feature in the rustdoc book.

cc ``@cjgillot``
r? ``@notriddle``
…c, r=oli-obk

diagnostics: port more diagnostics to derive + add support for `Vec` fields

- Port "unconstrained opaque type" diagnostic to using the derive.
- Allow `Vec` fields in diagnostic derive - enables support for diagnostics that have multiple primary spans, or have subdiagnostics repeated at multiple locations. `Vec<..>` fields in the diagnostic derive become loops in the generated code.
- Add `create_{err,warning}` - there wasn't a way to create a diagnostic from a struct and not emit it straight away.
- Port "explicit generic args w/ impl trait" diagnostic to using the derive.

r? `````@oli-obk`````
cc `````@pvdrz`````
Improve validator around field projections and checked bin ops

The two commits are unrelated. In both cases, these rules were already documented in MIR docs.
Change eslint rules from configuration comments to configuration file

Repeatedly declaring eslint rules in source files is an annoying thing, we should move those rules into the eslint configuration file.

r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
…ix, r=JohnTitor

Fix a minor typo in the description of Formatter
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 7, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2022

📌 Commit c6007d6 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 7, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2022

⌛ Testing commit c6007d6 with merge f9b2e3c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing f9b2e3c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 7, 2022
@bors bors merged commit f9b2e3c into rust-lang:master May 7, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 7, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

📣 Toolstate changed by #96816!

Tested on commit f9b2e3c.
Direct link to PR: #96816

🎉 miri on windows: test-fail → test-pass (cc @RalfJung @eddyb @oli-obk).
🎉 miri on linux: test-fail → test-pass (cc @RalfJung @eddyb @oli-obk).

rust-highfive added a commit to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate that referenced this pull request May 7, 2022
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@f9b2e3c.
Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#96816>

🎉 miri on windows: test-fail → test-pass (cc @RalfJung @eddyb @oli-obk).
🎉 miri on linux: test-fail → test-pass (cc @RalfJung @eddyb @oli-obk).
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-oumn95i branch May 7, 2022 16:26
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f9b2e3c): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 0 0 1 0
mean2 N/A N/A N/A -0.2% N/A
max N/A N/A N/A -0.2% N/A

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants