Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): Update dev-non-major #7661

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

fix(deps): Update dev-non-major #7661

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 23, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/visual-editing (source) 2.2.2 -> 2.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/react (source) ^18.3.11 -> ^18.3.12 age adoption passing confidence
next (source) 15.0.0 -> 15.0.1 age adoption passing confidence
next (source) 14.2.15 -> 14.2.16 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/visual-editing)

v2.3.0

Features
  • visual-editing: add OptimisticDocument commit method (#​2023) (270c67d)
Bug Fixes
vercel/next.js (next)

v15.0.1

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot added the 📦 deps label Oct 23, 2024
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 22:51
@renovate renovate bot added the 🤖 bot label Oct 23, 2024
@renovate renovate bot requested review from ryanbonial and removed request for a team October 23, 2024 22:51
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 23, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 11:04pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 11:04pm
test-compiled-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 11:04pm
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 11:04pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 11:04pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 23, 2024 11:04pm

@stipsan stipsan added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2024
stipsan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Merged via the queue into next with commit abcc7f6 Oct 23, 2024
39 of 44 checks passed
@stipsan stipsan deleted the renovate/dev-non-major branch October 23, 2024 22:52
Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Oct 23, 2024 11:00 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 45s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 32s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 38s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 10s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 3m 0s 0 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 46s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 44s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 17s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 36s 12 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Wed, 23 Oct 2024 23:02:24 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 16.4 efps (61ms) 16.4 efps (61ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (body) 59.9 efps (17ms) 56.5 efps (18ms) +1ms (+6.0%)
article (string inside object) 17.5 efps (57ms) 16.8 efps (60ms) +3ms (+4.4%)
article (string inside array) 14.4 efps (70ms) 14.1 efps (71ms) +2ms (+2.2%)
recipe (name) 26.3 efps (38ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) -1ms (-2.6%)
recipe (description) 30.3 efps (33ms) 31.3 efps (32ms) -1ms (-3.0%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (7ms) 99.9+ efps (7ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 14.3 efps (70ms) 14.9 efps (67ms) -3ms (-4.3%)
synthetic (string inside object) 14.9 efps (67ms) 14.7 efps (68ms) +1ms (+1.5%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 61ms 72ms 83ms 293ms 625ms 13.6s
article (body) 17ms 19ms 25ms 119ms 302ms 5.5s
article (string inside object) 57ms 63ms 76ms 221ms 339ms 8.8s
article (string inside array) 70ms 75ms 87ms 218ms 1151ms 9.7s
recipe (name) 38ms 40ms 45ms 97ms 38ms 9.4s
recipe (description) 33ms 36ms 60ms 89ms 7ms 6.5s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 10ms 10ms 34ms 0ms 3.5s
synthetic (title) 70ms 76ms 87ms 357ms 1593ms 15.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 67ms 73ms 79ms 410ms 1432ms 10.7s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 61ms 66ms 74ms 252ms 561ms 14.3s
article (body) 18ms 20ms 28ms 68ms 244ms 5.9s
article (string inside object) 60ms 62ms 69ms 240ms 279ms 9.0s
article (string inside array) 71ms 77ms 86ms 320ms 1251ms 10.0s
recipe (name) 37ms 39ms 47ms 78ms 8ms 9.8s
recipe (description) 32ms 40ms 56ms 127ms 29ms 6.6s
recipe (instructions) 7ms 9ms 10ms 22ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 67ms 71ms 78ms 343ms 1460ms 15.2s
synthetic (string inside object) 68ms 71ms 89ms 318ms 1582ms 10.4s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

juice49 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant