Update EPA/EIA crosswalk of plant 55641 #389
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Generators CTG3, CTG4, STG2, and PV1 were proposed to be added to the Riverside Energy Center (Plant 55641) and were in testing as of 2019 with scheduled COD in 2020. However, starting in the 2020 EIA data, these generators disappeared from this plant, and reappeared as the West Riverside Energy Center (Plant 64020). Closes CAR-4543.
2019 Proposed Generator Data:
2020 Operational Generator Data:
I've updated the manual EPA-EIA crosswalk file to represent this. STG2 does not appear to directly show up in the data
Testing
We would expect the subplant crosswalk to reflect the new mapping.
As expected, the EPA 55641 is no longer associated with those two units at EIA 55641 (although they still appear in the crosswalk, which is strange since they were never built)
These two units are now associated with plant 64020, and are correctly linked to the same subplant as STG2
Review estimate
5 min
Future work
What issues were identified that are not being addressed in this PR but should be addressed in future work?
Checklist
black