Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix barrier status of falls on Ramsey Creek as per further review, ad…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…d fix for additional falls on Shawnigan Creek
  • Loading branch information
smnorris committed Oct 4, 2023
1 parent f84b6e6 commit 7b83ec9
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion data/user_barriers_definite_control.csv
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ blue_line_key,downstream_route_measure,barrier_type,barrier_ind,watershed_group_
356348405,144,SUBSURFACEFLOW,f,QUES,AL,2023-05-15,local knowledge,based on information provided by Bo and Jake at LDN workshop.
354144429,4301,FALLS,f,TAHS,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,falls removed 1981 though apparently still a partial barrier to PK and CM
354151971,55,FALLS,f,VICT,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,Fish transported above falls for >50 years
354151971,166,FALLS,f,VICT,SN,2023-09-20,,Fish transported above falls for >50 years as per falls at 55m
354152763,499,FALLS,t,SALM,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,Menzies Creek noted as salmon-bearing for first 1-Mile only.
354152847,3068,FALLS,f,BRKS,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,Catalogue of Salmon Streams notes spawners to 3 miles
356050266,0,SUBSURFACEFLOW,t,LFRA,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,Nothing in reference report to indicate exact location(s) of fish
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -191,7 +192,7 @@ blue_line_key,downstream_route_measure,barrier_type,barrier_ind,watershed_group_
356361749,45743,FALLS,t,DEAD,CWF - BR,2021-12-31,,Most literature seem to indicate Reach 11 as upstream-most distribution for Steelhead (falls is at break of 10/11). Seems that fish points in Yard Ck are likely actually Yard Ck in SHUL watershed. Points in Snohoosh Lake don't seem to have a reference document. Other Steelhead points seem unreliable. I would keep this as a barrier
356362728,1958,FALLS,t,MURT,CWF - BR,2021-12-31,,No salmon points showing upstream from here. Ok as is
356362743,154194,FALLS,f,ADMS,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,Multiple reference docs corroborate Coho spawning upstream of Tum Tum Lake. Falls noted as passable to Coho.
356363034,13,FALLS,f,NARC,CWF - BR,2021-12-31,,]
356363034,13,FALLS,t,NARC,CWF - BR,2021-12-31,,]
356363034,153,FALLS,t,NARC,CWF - BR,2021-12-31,,Same falls number on map twice. Reference document note that The distribution of Chinook is limited to below the 5 meter falls located approximately 200 m upstream from the confluence with Narcosoli Creek. Second reference document seems to be a transferred FISS point and likely inaccurate. Downstream falls point is likely incorrect. Upstream falls point should have no Chinook upstream.
356363170,641,FALLS,f,HARR,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,Could not find any indication of a falls here but a few reports note Coho presence
356363534,43468,SUBSURFACEFLOW,f,NARC,CWF - BR,2022-04-01,,CH points appear legitimate. Known spawning location documented just downstream.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7b83ec9

Please sign in to comment.